Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
China 1949 Scott # 1L134 my ancient catalogue values it at $250 BUT there are also reprints which are valued at $1.50.
How do I tell the difference between the original printing and reprints? My catalogue gives no indication on how to do this.
Thanks, Kim
Login to Like
this post
Hi Kim,
This is a reprint. The original stamps in this design have less shading on the fingers.
Login to Like
this post
Can't say I'm not disappointed but thanks very much.
Login to Like
this post
Most of us have probably been here before. I once was chatting with a stamp dealer who was examining some classic Canadian stamps, and found what he was hoped was a rare Large Queen on laid paper. He watermarked it (I guess laid paper shows up in a watermark tray), then swore, then pulled out his Bic lighter, struck a flame, and incinerated the stamp! I guess it wasn't on laid paper! I guess the lesson is that just as "No" means "No," "rare" means "rare"! 
Login to Like
this post
The Scott catalogs provide pictorial and textual descriptions of the differences between original and reprinted stamps from PR China.
Login to Like
this post
I found this Chinese stamp whilst doing a bit of a clear out. It is listed as:
China 1949 Scott # 1L134 my ancient catalogue values it at $250 BUT there are also reprints which are valued at $1.50.
How do I tell the difference between the original printing and reprints? My catalogue gives no indication on how to do this.
Thanks, Kim
Login to Like
this post
re: Can someone help?
Hi Kim,
This is a reprint. The original stamps in this design have less shading on the fingers.
Login to Like
this post
re: Can someone help?
Can't say I'm not disappointed but thanks very much.
Login to Like
this post
re: Can someone help?
Most of us have probably been here before. I once was chatting with a stamp dealer who was examining some classic Canadian stamps, and found what he was hoped was a rare Large Queen on laid paper. He watermarked it (I guess laid paper shows up in a watermark tray), then swore, then pulled out his Bic lighter, struck a flame, and incinerated the stamp! I guess it wasn't on laid paper! I guess the lesson is that just as "No" means "No," "rare" means "rare"!
Login to Like
this post
09:41:44pm
re: Can someone help?
The Scott catalogs provide pictorial and textual descriptions of the differences between original and reprinted stamps from PR China.
Login to Like
this post