What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
72 visitors online
What we collect!
72 visitors online


United States/Stamps : Different Plate Numbers in offset

 

Author
Postings
biggeorge
Members Picture


15 Sep 2014
01:00:09pm
I recently obtained a plats trip of 3 of the 1909 Lincoln (Sc 367). It has an interesting offset on the back. The plate number on the front is 4984.

Image Not Found

However on the back there is an offset in the selvedge only. The plate number on the offset is 4983. Why is the plate number different? Also the offset appears to be fairly well inked, but there is nothing in the stamp area.

Image Not Found

I thought that in "flat plate" printing, the same plate was used for each impression. When a change of the plate was necessary, the press was stopped, dismantled and the plate replaced. This would have allowed the impressions from the first plate to dry. If the plates were used sequentially. Plate 4983 would have been first.

I can imagine that a "separator" sheet (to separate the panes from different plates could have accounted for the lack of offset in the stamp area. There is a rather straight line at the top of this offset.

Any help would be appreciated! This may end up in an exhibit of strange thiggs involving stamps.

Thank you,

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
        

 

Author/Postings
Members Picture
biggeorge

15 Sep 2014
01:00:09pm

I recently obtained a plats trip of 3 of the 1909 Lincoln (Sc 367). It has an interesting offset on the back. The plate number on the front is 4984.

Image Not Found

However on the back there is an offset in the selvedge only. The plate number on the offset is 4983. Why is the plate number different? Also the offset appears to be fairly well inked, but there is nothing in the stamp area.

Image Not Found

I thought that in "flat plate" printing, the same plate was used for each impression. When a change of the plate was necessary, the press was stopped, dismantled and the plate replaced. This would have allowed the impressions from the first plate to dry. If the plates were used sequentially. Plate 4983 would have been first.

I can imagine that a "separator" sheet (to separate the panes from different plates could have accounted for the lack of offset in the stamp area. There is a rather straight line at the top of this offset.

Any help would be appreciated! This may end up in an exhibit of strange thiggs involving stamps.

Thank you,

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails


User Agreement

Copyright © 2022 Stamporama.com