That little claim check stub above the Certified label is the clue. That's for Return Receipt Service, which was 45 cents at that time.
Lars
What I find interesting about this cover is not only the rate puzzle (0.80 + .15 + . 45 = $1.40), but the fact that it was apparently never delivered. It was postmarked 9-12-78. First notice was 9-13-78. Second notice was 9-18-78. The item was returned 9-28-78.
Do you get a refund of the delivery confirmation fee if it's not delivered? That question is beyond my area of expertise!
Lars
I couldn't tell you about 1978, but currently you do not receive any refund for delivery confirmation of the Return Receipt fee on Certified Mail that comes back unclaimed.
*edited for accuracy
I am wondering Lars if the return date was written on the claim check, but the item was picked up before the return date. As it happens I got this cover as part of a box lot of correspondence all to the same person, so I am quite positive it did get into the hands of the addressee.
Thanks for clearing up the rate for me. I wasn't sure if having a claim check necessarily meant that the return receipt service was provided.
Everyone is making the assumption that the postage applied was correct at the time the letter was mailed. Could be the sender was an idiot such as myself, who, when no scale or rate sheet is available, will just stick on a bunch of stamps. I have often carried such a letter into a post office only to be told by the clerk that I had overpaid. Since I couldn't remove the excess postage, it was sent as is.
In many cases, Bobby, you are right. I think in this case where there was a paid mail clerk who was responsible for keeping an accurate tally of postage used, there would be more precision.
I often go into the post office with stamps already attached. And if I have attached too much, and as there is no way to remove the excess postage, the letter is sent anyway regardless of what the vigilant postal clerk tells me. And, yes, the clerk hand cancels the excess postage along with the other stamps. So if you ever run across a cover with my address in the upper left, don't knock yourself out trying to figure it out, just chalk it up to that dumb Texas ex-patriot living in the wilds of the great northeast!
"I am wondering Lars if the return date was written on the claim check, but the item was picked up before the return date."
I am cataloging my collection of covers mailed from Saint Paul, MN. This is a nice example of one mailed from the Rice Street Station in Little Canada (a suburb north of St. Paul).
To be honest, I never really liked Sudoku. I am having difficulty coming up with an exact rate to match this cover.
What I know
Certified Mail - 80¢
First Class Mail - 15¢
Likely multiple weight - 13¢ x 1-3?
Total franking on cover - $1.40
Here is the cover
.
Thanks for any help,
Antonio
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
That little claim check stub above the Certified label is the clue. That's for Return Receipt Service, which was 45 cents at that time.
Lars
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
What I find interesting about this cover is not only the rate puzzle (0.80 + .15 + . 45 = $1.40), but the fact that it was apparently never delivered. It was postmarked 9-12-78. First notice was 9-13-78. Second notice was 9-18-78. The item was returned 9-28-78.
Do you get a refund of the delivery confirmation fee if it's not delivered? That question is beyond my area of expertise!
Lars
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
I couldn't tell you about 1978, but currently you do not receive any refund for delivery confirmation of the Return Receipt fee on Certified Mail that comes back unclaimed.
*edited for accuracy
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
I am wondering Lars if the return date was written on the claim check, but the item was picked up before the return date. As it happens I got this cover as part of a box lot of correspondence all to the same person, so I am quite positive it did get into the hands of the addressee.
Thanks for clearing up the rate for me. I wasn't sure if having a claim check necessarily meant that the return receipt service was provided.
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
Everyone is making the assumption that the postage applied was correct at the time the letter was mailed. Could be the sender was an idiot such as myself, who, when no scale or rate sheet is available, will just stick on a bunch of stamps. I have often carried such a letter into a post office only to be told by the clerk that I had overpaid. Since I couldn't remove the excess postage, it was sent as is.
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
In many cases, Bobby, you are right. I think in this case where there was a paid mail clerk who was responsible for keeping an accurate tally of postage used, there would be more precision.
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
I often go into the post office with stamps already attached. And if I have attached too much, and as there is no way to remove the excess postage, the letter is sent anyway regardless of what the vigilant postal clerk tells me. And, yes, the clerk hand cancels the excess postage along with the other stamps. So if you ever run across a cover with my address in the upper left, don't knock yourself out trying to figure it out, just chalk it up to that dumb Texas ex-patriot living in the wilds of the great northeast!
re: Another Rate Puzzle for the Advanced Philatelists
"I am wondering Lars if the return date was written on the claim check, but the item was picked up before the return date."