From the US Treasury website ( US Treasury):
"Legal Tender Status
I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal?
The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."
This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy."
Our local Texas toll road authority only accepts their e-pass. Guys with
quarters are persona non grata.
That is the thing I remembered, Bobby.
Especially the words; " ..... are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. ...."
It makes me wonder if all the years I spent in school learning the language were a waste of time.
This reminds me of the IRS deciding in the late 1950s that "... exclusively.." really means " generally ' when enforcing certain parts of the Tax Code.
Thanks for digging it out as I am away from home and using a son's Apple laptop that wasn't made for my fingers.
Is there not a statement on all US currency that requires that such currency must be accepted as legal tender for any debt, public or private ???
Of course, that only applies to within the USA.
But, if that is true, it might be illegal for a member to require payment by Paypal or to refuse to accept cash by mail.
re: Paypal ------ Not, Part II
From the US Treasury website ( US Treasury):
"Legal Tender Status
I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal?
The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."
This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy."
re: Paypal ------ Not, Part II
Our local Texas toll road authority only accepts their e-pass. Guys with
quarters are persona non grata.
re: Paypal ------ Not, Part II
That is the thing I remembered, Bobby.
Especially the words; " ..... are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. ...."
It makes me wonder if all the years I spent in school learning the language were a waste of time.
This reminds me of the IRS deciding in the late 1950s that "... exclusively.." really means " generally ' when enforcing certain parts of the Tax Code.
Thanks for digging it out as I am away from home and using a son's Apple laptop that wasn't made for my fingers.