What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
What we collect!


General Philatelic/Newcomer Cnr : "Official" stamps

 

Author
Postings
rniekamp
Members Picture


29 Aug 2013
07:43:58am
As I've been accumulating stamps for my re-born collection, I find I'm getting a lot of "official" stamps. I know these are intended for use by government offices. Usually, regular stamps are overprinted with "official." The bulk of mine are from Latin America, but I have them from many other countries. My question is this: Are official stamps worth collecting? How do you all handle them -- as a separate issue, or just a variety? Frankly, official stamps don't interest me, although I've put some in my album as placeholders for the regular issue which I don't have. Thoughts?
Like
Login to Like
this post
amsd
Members Picture


Editor, Seal News; contributor, JuicyHeads

29 Aug 2013
08:04:29am
re: "Official" stamps

Ray, no reason not to do what you are doing. it certainly works in many countries where you have some overprint on a regular issue. Won't work in the states or Germany or Czechoslovakia but will in much of the commonwealth.

in terms of is it a good area, that's defined by you. Frankly, i think finding officials properly used on cover, especially non-philatelic uses (meant in the broadest terms, and not necessarily perjoratively) is a great challenge. Try that in the States, for instance. I know it's not exactly what you asked, but it's precisely what I answered.

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Save the USPS, buy stamps; save the hobby, use commemoratives"

juicyheads.com/link.php?PLJZJP
Rhinelander
Members Picture


Support the Hobby -- Join the American Philatelic Society

29 Aug 2013
11:33:25am
re: "Official" stamps

Yes. Official stamps are very much worth collecting. I like them. However, it does not mean that all stamp collectors must collect them.

Most catalogs distinguish postage stamps for general postage and "special purpose" stamps, such as postage dues, postal tax, air mail, parcel post, official mail etc. If you occasionally work with catalogs other than Scott, you will find that what belongs in the main body of the stamp listings, and what are "back of book" issues is not very clear. Scott separates out many issues that other catalogs include in the main listings. What is general use and what are special use stamps simply differs quite a bit from catalog to catalog. Usually, stamps put in the Appendix to the regular country listings garner less interest than the stamps in the main listings. Then again, there are collectors that specifically only collect certain back-of-book issues, such as airmails or postage dues.

I believe you have a lot of autonomy on this question. You should be aware however that while some official stamps have been created by overprinting a regular issue stamp, it really is an altogether different stamp. An overprinted stamps is not a variety of the un-overprinted stamp. So, if you want to mount an altogether different stamp (despite its similarity in appearance) in a given spot, or if you want to leave this spot empty for now until the stamp that actually belongs in the spot comes along, is a question of personal preference.

However, I have given my opinion on organization as a desirable quality of a collection (all else equal), and if you subscribe to that notion, one would prefer not mixing, but organizing the general use stamps separately from the set for official use. If you want to follow the catalog in doing so, i.e., have all the general stamps first, and the official and other special use stamps at the end of the album, as most collectors do, is one option. I also found it quite effective to do away with the Scott pre-determined organization, but to use a chronological approach, showing the regular set first and mounting the official overprinted set right below. All your choice ...

Like
Login to Like
this post
larsdog
Members Picture


APS #220693 ATA#57179

29 Aug 2013
05:35:40pm
re: "Official" stamps

I collect only US, so I can only talk to that area.

US Officials are separate designs, so they are typically found in the "Back of Book" section if a collector desires to include them. Personally, I do include officials.

If they were overprints, however, and especially if they were only overprints, I would be more likely to include them with the non-overprinted definitive, if I decided to include them at all. I suspect I would include them given similar decisions about National Precancels, but it's strictly up to you.

Cheers!

Lars

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Expanding your knowledge faster than your collection can save you a few bucks."

stamps.colp.info
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:19:11pm
re: "Official" stamps

Officials, because they had a very specific postal function, are a most fascinating area. Although hte stamps may be quite common, have you tried looking for them on cover...?

To illustrate what I mean and how the subject can develop, here is a piece I put together two years ago when I began to look at how Yugoslav Officials were actually used, and how this deviated from what one expects:
Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:20:53pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:21:34pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:22:24pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:23:13pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:24:40pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:25:40pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:26:39pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:28:05pm
re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:40:24pm
re: "Official" stamps

Another example of how fascinating Officials can be, are the Ministry stamps of Argentina. Many sets of Argentine stamps were overprinted for use by eight different Ministries, none of whom used exactly the same range of stamps (particularly taking into account variations of watermark, typeface and printing method). There were masses of these things prepared; yet how often do you see one on cover?

Here is a small sample from the Ministry of Justice and Education. (The crosses indicate types which were used by some Ministries, but not by the MJI)
Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bobstew617
Members Picture


29 Aug 2013
08:59:22pm
re: "Official" stamps

If a country I collect has issued Officials, I collect them.

Luxembourg is interesting to me for these stamps as "OFFICIEL" is perfined (perforated)across some of the stamps.

Then comes SWITZERLAND --that's a whole story unto itself.Hypnotized

Like
Login to Like
this post
        

 

Author/Postings
Members Picture
rniekamp

29 Aug 2013
07:43:58am

As I've been accumulating stamps for my re-born collection, I find I'm getting a lot of "official" stamps. I know these are intended for use by government offices. Usually, regular stamps are overprinted with "official." The bulk of mine are from Latin America, but I have them from many other countries. My question is this: Are official stamps worth collecting? How do you all handle them -- as a separate issue, or just a variety? Frankly, official stamps don't interest me, although I've put some in my album as placeholders for the regular issue which I don't have. Thoughts?

Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
amsd

Editor, Seal News; contributor, JuicyHeads
29 Aug 2013
08:04:29am

re: "Official" stamps

Ray, no reason not to do what you are doing. it certainly works in many countries where you have some overprint on a regular issue. Won't work in the states or Germany or Czechoslovakia but will in much of the commonwealth.

in terms of is it a good area, that's defined by you. Frankly, i think finding officials properly used on cover, especially non-philatelic uses (meant in the broadest terms, and not necessarily perjoratively) is a great challenge. Try that in the States, for instance. I know it's not exactly what you asked, but it's precisely what I answered.

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Save the USPS, buy stamps; save the hobby, use commemoratives"

juicyheads.com/link. ...
Members Picture
Rhinelander

Support the Hobby -- Join the American Philatelic Society
29 Aug 2013
11:33:25am

re: "Official" stamps

Yes. Official stamps are very much worth collecting. I like them. However, it does not mean that all stamp collectors must collect them.

Most catalogs distinguish postage stamps for general postage and "special purpose" stamps, such as postage dues, postal tax, air mail, parcel post, official mail etc. If you occasionally work with catalogs other than Scott, you will find that what belongs in the main body of the stamp listings, and what are "back of book" issues is not very clear. Scott separates out many issues that other catalogs include in the main listings. What is general use and what are special use stamps simply differs quite a bit from catalog to catalog. Usually, stamps put in the Appendix to the regular country listings garner less interest than the stamps in the main listings. Then again, there are collectors that specifically only collect certain back-of-book issues, such as airmails or postage dues.

I believe you have a lot of autonomy on this question. You should be aware however that while some official stamps have been created by overprinting a regular issue stamp, it really is an altogether different stamp. An overprinted stamps is not a variety of the un-overprinted stamp. So, if you want to mount an altogether different stamp (despite its similarity in appearance) in a given spot, or if you want to leave this spot empty for now until the stamp that actually belongs in the spot comes along, is a question of personal preference.

However, I have given my opinion on organization as a desirable quality of a collection (all else equal), and if you subscribe to that notion, one would prefer not mixing, but organizing the general use stamps separately from the set for official use. If you want to follow the catalog in doing so, i.e., have all the general stamps first, and the official and other special use stamps at the end of the album, as most collectors do, is one option. I also found it quite effective to do away with the Scott pre-determined organization, but to use a chronological approach, showing the regular set first and mounting the official overprinted set right below. All your choice ...

Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
larsdog

APS #220693 ATA#57179
29 Aug 2013
05:35:40pm

re: "Official" stamps

I collect only US, so I can only talk to that area.

US Officials are separate designs, so they are typically found in the "Back of Book" section if a collector desires to include them. Personally, I do include officials.

If they were overprints, however, and especially if they were only overprints, I would be more likely to include them with the non-overprinted definitive, if I decided to include them at all. I suspect I would include them given similar decisions about National Precancels, but it's strictly up to you.

Cheers!

Lars

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Expanding your knowledge faster than your collection can save you a few bucks."

stamps.colp.info
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:19:11pm

re: "Official" stamps

Officials, because they had a very specific postal function, are a most fascinating area. Although hte stamps may be quite common, have you tried looking for them on cover...?

To illustrate what I mean and how the subject can develop, here is a piece I put together two years ago when I began to look at how Yugoslav Officials were actually used, and how this deviated from what one expects:
Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:20:53pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:21:34pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:22:24pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:23:13pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:24:40pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:25:40pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:26:39pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:28:05pm

re: "Official" stamps

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
bamra1

29 Aug 2013
06:40:24pm

re: "Official" stamps

Another example of how fascinating Officials can be, are the Ministry stamps of Argentina. Many sets of Argentine stamps were overprinted for use by eight different Ministries, none of whom used exactly the same range of stamps (particularly taking into account variations of watermark, typeface and printing method). There were masses of these things prepared; yet how often do you see one on cover?

Here is a small sample from the Ministry of Justice and Education. (The crosses indicate types which were used by some Ministries, but not by the MJI)
Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
bobstew617

29 Aug 2013
08:59:22pm

re: "Official" stamps

If a country I collect has issued Officials, I collect them.

Luxembourg is interesting to me for these stamps as "OFFICIEL" is perfined (perforated)across some of the stamps.

Then comes SWITZERLAND --that's a whole story unto itself.Hypnotized

Like
Login to Like
this post
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails | Facebook


User Agreement

Copyright © 2024 Stamporama.com