What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
What we collect!


United States/Covers & Postmarks : First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

 

Author
Postings
saleem
Members Picture


31 Jan 2013
12:25:17pm
Another new acquisition for my airmail collection is this cover postmarked Dayton, Ohio 'First Day of use Luminiscent Tagging'. I am sure this applies to Airmail stamps 'red taggant' only.

Image Not Found


Like
Login to Like
this post

"Experience is the name you give to the mistakes you made yesterday."
michael78651

31 Jan 2013
02:10:39pm
re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

Actually that was the first stamp to be tagged, August 1, 1963. The first regular postage stamp to be tagged was Scott #1238, City Mail Delivery issue, on October 26, 1963.

Like
Login to Like
this post
tomiseksj
Members Picture


01 Feb 2013
10:09:32am
re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

The below article from U.S. Postal Bulletin, Volume 84, Issue 20372 (18Jul1963) provides background information on the experimental use of luminescent tagging.

Steve

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post

"APS Member #130102; SRS Member #1570"

thestampforum.boards.net
Rhinelander
Members Picture


Support the Hobby -- Join the American Philatelic Society

01 Feb 2013
02:45:47pm
re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

I don't have a lot of FDCs, but kept this one from ArtCraft for the illustration:

Image Not Found

The FDC shows the Pitney-Bowes Mark II Facer Canceller machine. The major advancement about prior equipment was that it made obsolete the step of first manually turning and organizing all envelops such that the stamp was in the same position before the stack of envelopes could be fed into the cancelling machine.

The first facer canceller, the "Mark I," tried out in 1957, was actually a Dutch machine manufactured by Verkspoor N.V. of Holland, but because of the Postal Department's concern about contracting with a foreign company, Verkspoor collaborated with Pitney-Bowes (they also did that for their more famous invention, the Transorma). The American made "Mark II" was essentially two Mark I's operating in tandem. That is what you see in the picture -- two cancelling machines in a line. The POD placed an inital order of twenty-five facer cancellers. Each Mark II has four cancellers and the first installation cities Washington, DC, Philadelphia, and Detroit each received two machines, plus a single unit was placed in Stamford, CT (home of Pitney-Bowes). Hence, twenty five cancellers. EKU of these first couple of prototype Mark IIs, which can be identified by their unique cancelling impressions, is Washington, DC May 5, 1958.

Image Not Found

Now, if anyone has an interest in how exactly the machine worked, why you wanted to have two in a row, etc., I can elaborate on it, but don't have to bore anyone. The reason why I have been writing this all up thus far, is actually only to make one point: the installation of the first facer-cancellers preceeded the issuance of the first taggged stamps by more than four years! The very common urban legend that tagged stamps were introduced to enable automatic facing and cancelling of mail matter, therefore is not entirely correct. And from Steve's newspaper clip we also learn that Dayton had a Mark II machine before the introduction of the tagged 8c Air Mail.

The answer is that all Mark IIs here to date used optical scanners, whereas in the Dayton trials an electronic scanning mechanism was tested. Because only the scanning mechanism was changed there is no observable difference in the machine markings. To bad, because if it is for the Mark IIs, or all earlier and later developments in postal mechanization, specialist always seek documentation of the evolution of the postal system. For instance, but I have to end it here, even though it is known that the POD conducted tests with the Mark I in Washington DC in 1957, I am not aware that any covers from these test runs have survived. Such a cover would be a wonderful find in a dollar box.

Arno







Like
Login to Like
this post
saleem
Members Picture


01 Feb 2013
10:33:55pm
re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

Hi Steve and Arno - it started with a bud and ended up looking and smelling like a flower in full bloom! Thanks for posting such interesting information, now I have learned something new by just posting an image of a cover. Would certainly like to hear more about this especially about the red and green taggant segregation by these machines.

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Experience is the name you give to the mistakes you made yesterday."
petert4522

03 Feb 2013
10:39:32am
re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

Very interesting indeed.
Just want to put in my two cents: The Dutch company that built the cancellers was not "Verkspoor, but "Werkspoor".

Peter

Like
Login to Like
this post
        

 

Author/Postings
Members Picture
saleem

31 Jan 2013
12:25:17pm

Another new acquisition for my airmail collection is this cover postmarked Dayton, Ohio 'First Day of use Luminiscent Tagging'. I am sure this applies to Airmail stamps 'red taggant' only.

Image Not Found


Like
Login to Like
this post

"Experience is the name you give to the mistakes you made yesterday."
michael78651

31 Jan 2013
02:10:39pm

re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

Actually that was the first stamp to be tagged, August 1, 1963. The first regular postage stamp to be tagged was Scott #1238, City Mail Delivery issue, on October 26, 1963.

Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
tomiseksj

01 Feb 2013
10:09:32am

re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

The below article from U.S. Postal Bulletin, Volume 84, Issue 20372 (18Jul1963) provides background information on the experimental use of luminescent tagging.

Steve

Image Not Found

Like
Login to Like
this post

"APS Member #130102; SRS Member #1570"

thestampforum.boards ...
Members Picture
Rhinelander

Support the Hobby -- Join the American Philatelic Society
01 Feb 2013
02:45:47pm

re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

I don't have a lot of FDCs, but kept this one from ArtCraft for the illustration:

Image Not Found

The FDC shows the Pitney-Bowes Mark II Facer Canceller machine. The major advancement about prior equipment was that it made obsolete the step of first manually turning and organizing all envelops such that the stamp was in the same position before the stack of envelopes could be fed into the cancelling machine.

The first facer canceller, the "Mark I," tried out in 1957, was actually a Dutch machine manufactured by Verkspoor N.V. of Holland, but because of the Postal Department's concern about contracting with a foreign company, Verkspoor collaborated with Pitney-Bowes (they also did that for their more famous invention, the Transorma). The American made "Mark II" was essentially two Mark I's operating in tandem. That is what you see in the picture -- two cancelling machines in a line. The POD placed an inital order of twenty-five facer cancellers. Each Mark II has four cancellers and the first installation cities Washington, DC, Philadelphia, and Detroit each received two machines, plus a single unit was placed in Stamford, CT (home of Pitney-Bowes). Hence, twenty five cancellers. EKU of these first couple of prototype Mark IIs, which can be identified by their unique cancelling impressions, is Washington, DC May 5, 1958.

Image Not Found

Now, if anyone has an interest in how exactly the machine worked, why you wanted to have two in a row, etc., I can elaborate on it, but don't have to bore anyone. The reason why I have been writing this all up thus far, is actually only to make one point: the installation of the first facer-cancellers preceeded the issuance of the first taggged stamps by more than four years! The very common urban legend that tagged stamps were introduced to enable automatic facing and cancelling of mail matter, therefore is not entirely correct. And from Steve's newspaper clip we also learn that Dayton had a Mark II machine before the introduction of the tagged 8c Air Mail.

The answer is that all Mark IIs here to date used optical scanners, whereas in the Dayton trials an electronic scanning mechanism was tested. Because only the scanning mechanism was changed there is no observable difference in the machine markings. To bad, because if it is for the Mark IIs, or all earlier and later developments in postal mechanization, specialist always seek documentation of the evolution of the postal system. For instance, but I have to end it here, even though it is known that the POD conducted tests with the Mark I in Washington DC in 1957, I am not aware that any covers from these test runs have survived. Such a cover would be a wonderful find in a dollar box.

Arno







Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
saleem

01 Feb 2013
10:33:55pm

re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

Hi Steve and Arno - it started with a bud and ended up looking and smelling like a flower in full bloom! Thanks for posting such interesting information, now I have learned something new by just posting an image of a cover. Would certainly like to hear more about this especially about the red and green taggant segregation by these machines.

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Experience is the name you give to the mistakes you made yesterday."
petert4522

03 Feb 2013
10:39:32am

re: First Day of Luminescent Tagging; Pitney Bowes Mark II facer-canceller machines

Very interesting indeed.
Just want to put in my two cents: The Dutch company that built the cancellers was not "Verkspoor, but "Werkspoor".

Peter

Like
Login to Like
this post
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails | Facebook


User Agreement

Copyright © 2024 Stamporama.com