Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Login to Like
this post
In my humble opinion what is wrong is that the person has made a mistake in his posting?
Login to Like
this post
@Terry
Perhaps instead of mistake change to read mistakes!
Login to Like
this post
03:15:34pm
I must be particularly dense today but I have no idea what this post is about!!
Login to Like
this post
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Look like I forgot to attach the scan, sorry!
This scan should have been on my posting dated: 09 May 2025 10:37:35am
Login to Like
this post
Can you post a scan of the back of the stamp?
4 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
This is an Ebay listing, so I cannot, it might have helped.
It is what it is.
Just using the front can you see the mistakes?
I see at least 2!
Login to Like
this post
You have to admit 1899, you have set yourself up for that request. LOL
Login to Like
this post
Forgot to list a fault in the top-left corner. (A tear for sure!)
Oh, also a Documentry futture delivery stamp, not really a standard rev.)
Mint No Gum?!
Anyway, I'm sure there is more...
And, thank you for the clarification!
- Ari 
Login to Like
this post
@PhilatelistMag20
You said "Oh, also a Documentry futture delivery stamp, not really a standard rev.)", what is a standard rev?
Login to Like
this post
Like a normal US Internal Revenue stamp...
Login to Like
this post
03:19:25pm
How is it not a Revenue Stamp? Listed by Scott as RC25 (at least that is correct).
It has exactly the same status as Stock Transfer stamps, except that these are for use by futures exchanges or other organizations that deal in products for future delivery, to be applied to the contracts.
Roy
3 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Asyou dsaid, RC#XX Not #RXX
So, A different themed issue!
Login to Like
this post
So... is that like regular postage stamps that are overprinted "Aereo"? Thus, changing their usage from regular postage to airmail postage. The Scott catalog then numbers the overprinted stamp with a "C" prefix. I would not see a "mistake" in that case.
Login to Like
this post
re: I think somebody made a mistake
In my humble opinion what is wrong is that the person has made a mistake in his posting?
Login to Like
this post
re: I think somebody made a mistake
@Terry
Perhaps instead of mistake change to read mistakes!
Login to Like
this post
This is my diabetic cat OBI! I think, therefore I am - I think! Descartes, sort of!
09 May 2025
03:15:34pm
re: I think somebody made a mistake
I must be particularly dense today but I have no idea what this post is about!!
Login to Like
this post
re: I think somebody made a mistake
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
re: I think somebody made a mistake
Look like I forgot to attach the scan, sorry!
This scan should have been on my posting dated: 09 May 2025 10:37:35am
Login to Like
this post
re: I think somebody made a mistake
Can you post a scan of the back of the stamp?
4 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
re: I think somebody made a mistake
This is an Ebay listing, so I cannot, it might have helped.
It is what it is.
Just using the front can you see the mistakes?
I see at least 2!
Login to Like
this post
06:53:57pm
re: I think somebody made a mistake
You have to admit 1899, you have set yourself up for that request. LOL
Login to Like
this post
Approvals
re: I think somebody made a mistake
Forgot to list a fault in the top-left corner. (A tear for sure!)
Oh, also a Documentry futture delivery stamp, not really a standard rev.)
Mint No Gum?!
Anyway, I'm sure there is more...
And, thank you for the clarification!
- Ari
Login to Like
this post
re: I think somebody made a mistake
@PhilatelistMag20
You said "Oh, also a Documentry futture delivery stamp, not really a standard rev.)", what is a standard rev?
Login to Like
this post
Approvals
re: I think somebody made a mistake
Like a normal US Internal Revenue stamp...
Login to Like
this post
BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50 - Easy browsing 500 categories
11 May 2025
03:19:25pm
re: I think somebody made a mistake
How is it not a Revenue Stamp? Listed by Scott as RC25 (at least that is correct).
It has exactly the same status as Stock Transfer stamps, except that these are for use by futures exchanges or other organizations that deal in products for future delivery, to be applied to the contracts.
Roy
3 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Approvals
re: I think somebody made a mistake
Asyou dsaid, RC#XX Not #RXX
So, A different themed issue!
Login to Like
this post
re: I think somebody made a mistake
So... is that like regular postage stamps that are overprinted "Aereo"? Thus, changing their usage from regular postage to airmail postage. The Scott catalog then numbers the overprinted stamp with a "C" prefix. I would not see a "mistake" in that case.
Login to Like
this post