I do not know specific reason but Scott has renumbered stamps several times over the years due to changes in how they classify.
It's fairly common for Scott's to renumber or drop stamps. I have one page in my Harris Liberty Album where 5 stamps have been crossed out because they are now considered to be trial colours or essays. I keep a list of numbers that are now DNE's in my album. This is a Civil War era series with several stamps that have been dropped by Scott's and there are many more. Sometimes stamps are added as well. Can you imagine the chaos if Scott's would decide to renumber their US stamps?
Harvey,
That example of Scott 67 is NICE. My kind of stamp.
In this time period you get some amazing fancy cancels!!! I have been making up my own names since I don't have any reference material. I really like tha combination of the bullseye and the swirl pattern on #76! I've looked on line for "fancy cancels" and there really are some amazing one available out there. In most cases I just ended up with them and have some nice ones - total fluke!! I wish there were serious collectors in the area to talk to but no such luck!
There is a lot of book covering just fancy cancels!
I like the San Francisco Cog cancels, or the New York Pearls cancel!
I am not sure exactly why but the New York string of pearls is considered to be a silent precancel. It's mentioned in a book someone sent me on Silent Precancels written by David W. Smith. What I would really like to have is an article that shows the fancy cancels and what they are called. I don't need a book that lists them all by stamp and prices. That would be enough for me!
Edit: After checking online it looks like my #78 has a San Francisco cog cancel.
Edit: Found this video which has some information on fancy cancels. Just watching the video, I expected a lot of information but it's just a regular collector who really has very little information about what he's trying to discuss. I'll probably give the rest of it a pass!! It was actually pretty useless!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rcJOLUY ...
Also #71
In this case #436 used to be 12 cents copper red. At some point Scott decided this variety didn't qualify for its own catalog number and so now it is #435a. This change happened sometime between 1932 and 1960. The other number was lost earlier, but it was due to a rearrangement of the 2 cent red and carmine shades and types.
Jan
Jan, Thanks for that info.
Also Harvey, your collection has me drooling!
I mean just LOOK at that #71 and #72!
I wish I had those stamps.
Maybe one day they will be in my price range...
Wow!
Thanks everyone for the info.
Happy 2025!
-Ari
"Maybe one day they will be in my price range..."
Similar situation except due to divorce. At least the lawyers left me with my stamp collection, probably because they would have had to wrench it from my cold dead hands. She got most of the antiques though. I bought new furniture and antique slot machines when all was said and done. What charities will accept stamp collections?
"What charities will accept stamp collections?"
Hi Harvey!
That's wonderful to hear that you are giving some of you stamps proceeds to charity.
When I get older I hope to leave my stamp collection to my family!
This guy sounds like a nice dealer!
Do you have his email?
Thanks!
-Ari
I'll send you his web site in a message! I'm sure he could you a few more buyers!!
Missing numbers are common.
There are also no 48-62, 66, 74, 520-522, 574, 580, 592, 593, 607-609, etc.
That's a lot!
In this case I do know that Scott changed #74 to trial color proof on paper.
Yes, and there is a fascinating story about 55-62. Those were originally thought to be the Premier Gravure (or August) issues - the first issues of Civil War stamps. However, it was discovered that they were all really just essays and trial color proofs with the exception of the 10c issue. But that wasn't a "premiere" issue at all. When they ran short of 10c stamps (#68) for mail to California, instead of creating new plates of #68 they grabbed the plate for 58 and used it in production. The result was #62B.
Thats a very cool story larsdog!
You've got a lot of Philatelic Info!
I was reading my Scott Catalog and I noticed it goes 434,435,437 and 449,450,452!
Why is this?
Was there a misunderstanding in an early printing or was there a different reason.
Thanks!
-Ari
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
I do not know specific reason but Scott has renumbered stamps several times over the years due to changes in how they classify.
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
It's fairly common for Scott's to renumber or drop stamps. I have one page in my Harris Liberty Album where 5 stamps have been crossed out because they are now considered to be trial colours or essays. I keep a list of numbers that are now DNE's in my album. This is a Civil War era series with several stamps that have been dropped by Scott's and there are many more. Sometimes stamps are added as well. Can you imagine the chaos if Scott's would decide to renumber their US stamps?
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Harvey,
That example of Scott 67 is NICE. My kind of stamp.
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
In this time period you get some amazing fancy cancels!!! I have been making up my own names since I don't have any reference material. I really like tha combination of the bullseye and the swirl pattern on #76! I've looked on line for "fancy cancels" and there really are some amazing one available out there. In most cases I just ended up with them and have some nice ones - total fluke!! I wish there were serious collectors in the area to talk to but no such luck!
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
There is a lot of book covering just fancy cancels!
I like the San Francisco Cog cancels, or the New York Pearls cancel!
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
I am not sure exactly why but the New York string of pearls is considered to be a silent precancel. It's mentioned in a book someone sent me on Silent Precancels written by David W. Smith. What I would really like to have is an article that shows the fancy cancels and what they are called. I don't need a book that lists them all by stamp and prices. That would be enough for me!
Edit: After checking online it looks like my #78 has a San Francisco cog cancel.
Edit: Found this video which has some information on fancy cancels. Just watching the video, I expected a lot of information but it's just a regular collector who really has very little information about what he's trying to discuss. I'll probably give the rest of it a pass!! It was actually pretty useless!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rcJOLUY ...
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Also #71
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
In this case #436 used to be 12 cents copper red. At some point Scott decided this variety didn't qualify for its own catalog number and so now it is #435a. This change happened sometime between 1932 and 1960. The other number was lost earlier, but it was due to a rearrangement of the 2 cent red and carmine shades and types.
Jan
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Jan, Thanks for that info.
Also Harvey, your collection has me drooling!
I mean just LOOK at that #71 and #72!
I wish I had those stamps.
Maybe one day they will be in my price range...
Wow!
Thanks everyone for the info.
Happy 2025!
-Ari
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
"Maybe one day they will be in my price range..."
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Similar situation except due to divorce. At least the lawyers left me with my stamp collection, probably because they would have had to wrench it from my cold dead hands. She got most of the antiques though. I bought new furniture and antique slot machines when all was said and done. What charities will accept stamp collections?
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
"What charities will accept stamp collections?"
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Hi Harvey!
That's wonderful to hear that you are giving some of you stamps proceeds to charity.
When I get older I hope to leave my stamp collection to my family!
This guy sounds like a nice dealer!
Do you have his email?
Thanks!
-Ari
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
I'll send you his web site in a message! I'm sure he could you a few more buyers!!
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Missing numbers are common.
There are also no 48-62, 66, 74, 520-522, 574, 580, 592, 593, 607-609, etc.
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
That's a lot!
In this case I do know that Scott changed #74 to trial color proof on paper.
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Yes, and there is a fascinating story about 55-62. Those were originally thought to be the Premier Gravure (or August) issues - the first issues of Civil War stamps. However, it was discovered that they were all really just essays and trial color proofs with the exception of the 10c issue. But that wasn't a "premiere" issue at all. When they ran short of 10c stamps (#68) for mail to California, instead of creating new plates of #68 they grabbed the plate for 58 and used it in production. The result was #62B.
re: I just realized there is no Scott #436 Or #451?
Thats a very cool story larsdog!
You've got a lot of Philatelic Info!