Hi 1898.......You don't need to start a new topic for the same subject. You can add to your earlier post so everything on the discussion board is neat and tidy. Thanks and thanks for posting.
Maybe one of the mods can combine.
Londonbus1
@londonbus1
Thank you for your posting.
I considered adding to my previous posting, that makes sense. But after thinking about it I decided not to do this. I really don't see any reason to combine posting.
Again thank you for you posting.
Good luck in your future collecting efforts.
1898
Hi 1898,
There is one simple reason to add this to your other post so let me explain.
Later today, or tomorrow, you might find another 'misidentified' stamp from the USA or elsewhere. Only those visitors to SOR will read your post. Later in the week, or next week you might find more misidentified stamps and so all over the board there will be threads for misidentified stamps. In any given world, it will make the board look a trifle silly and definitely not looked after. Which will be bad for SOR. Having a list of misidentified stamps in one thread (even a thread for each country is preferable) is far easier to read and looks much more neat and tidy. I would recommend one thread for all countries in the General Philatelic category.
But all this is up to you unless those higher up the ladder are in agreement. I just ask nicely that you think about it, think about the board and it's appearance.
many thanks
Londonbus1
@londonbus1
I do not agree, but the higher ups have decided, they all go into one thread, makes no difference where the stamps comes from, could be regular issue, revenue, etc. and etc.
Thank you
1898
What do you want us to do about this mistake? Contact the seller and tell them what the correct id should be. We can't fix this. We didn't find it, you did.
If you aren't willing to help others, why point out their mistakes?
@purrfin2
I'm help by pointing out the incorrect identification!
What SOR members do is up to them!
I only point out mistakes period, nothing else!
1898
re: Misidentified
Hi 1898.......You don't need to start a new topic for the same subject. You can add to your earlier post so everything on the discussion board is neat and tidy. Thanks and thanks for posting.
Maybe one of the mods can combine.
Londonbus1
re: Misidentified
@londonbus1
Thank you for your posting.
I considered adding to my previous posting, that makes sense. But after thinking about it I decided not to do this. I really don't see any reason to combine posting.
Again thank you for you posting.
Good luck in your future collecting efforts.
1898
re: Misidentified
Hi 1898,
There is one simple reason to add this to your other post so let me explain.
Later today, or tomorrow, you might find another 'misidentified' stamp from the USA or elsewhere. Only those visitors to SOR will read your post. Later in the week, or next week you might find more misidentified stamps and so all over the board there will be threads for misidentified stamps. In any given world, it will make the board look a trifle silly and definitely not looked after. Which will be bad for SOR. Having a list of misidentified stamps in one thread (even a thread for each country is preferable) is far easier to read and looks much more neat and tidy. I would recommend one thread for all countries in the General Philatelic category.
But all this is up to you unless those higher up the ladder are in agreement. I just ask nicely that you think about it, think about the board and it's appearance.
many thanks
Londonbus1
re: Misidentified
@londonbus1
I do not agree, but the higher ups have decided, they all go into one thread, makes no difference where the stamps comes from, could be regular issue, revenue, etc. and etc.
Thank you
1898
re: Misidentified
What do you want us to do about this mistake? Contact the seller and tell them what the correct id should be. We can't fix this. We didn't find it, you did.
If you aren't willing to help others, why point out their mistakes?
re: Misidentified
@purrfin2
I'm help by pointing out the incorrect identification!
What SOR members do is up to them!
I only point out mistakes period, nothing else!
1898