I wouldn't say "specialize", but since they are in my US album I do collect them and you're right, they are difficult to find. Some are more expensive than others but none are grossly expensive. I probably have about two thirds of them but haven't added a new one in quite a while. I picked some up here but it's been a while. I don't keep spares to offer you but I have a feeling if one of the sellers here offered some there'd be quite a scramble for them!! My cutoff for US is 1977 so I have no interest in the newer ones that do show up occasionally. And I did have quite a few of the newer types that I passed on to my stamp dealer for credit. Good luck!
Hard to find them in decent condition too.
This is an indication of which ones seem to show up more often just by using what I have managed to find. Are your numbers similar?
Agriculture 2 / 9, Executive 0 / 5, Interior 10 / 10, Justice 3 / 10, Navy 7 / 11, Post office 9 / 10, State 7 / 11, Treasury 11 / 11, War 9 / 11, Postal Savings 5 / 6, Those done by the American Bank Note Company 6 / 27 Some groups are much harder to find, usually because of rarity and expense.
Just for fun I searched Ebay for officials, 15,000 listed, I checked the first two pages page 1 186, page 2 192 of the orientation older officials.
So out of 15,000 perhaps there are of the right and proper orientation older officials maybe 4,000 or 5,000, seems to me there are plenty out there.
Perhaps ebay should be checked for officials?
"Perhaps ebay should be checked for officials?"
"So out of 15,000 perhaps there are of the right and proper orientation older officials "
@Roy
Go back to my posting and read the entire sentence!
I'd be willing to bet my lunch (...and it's steak!) That Roy HAS read, and reread everything in this thread.....he's thorough like that.
Your sentence is jibberish - maybe you should make an attempt to clarify it for everyone instead of making a seemingly angry retort - thank you in advance.
@musicaman
You are correct it is jibberish what Roy said, but he took it out of context, all he had to do what reread the entire sentence!
I made no angry retort to anyone, I was trying to help him understand, simple!
Definition of "orientation" ,
1.The act of orienting or the state of being oriented.
2. Location or position relative to the points of the compass.
3.The construction of a church so that its longitudinal axis has an east-west direction with the main altar usually at the eastern end.
Not sure what way this applies to stamps, unless it means face upwards.
Your full sentence is :- So out of 15,000 perhaps there are of the right and proper orientation older officials maybe 4,000 or 5,000, seems to me there are plenty out there.
Possibly it makes more sense as follows:-
So out of 15,000 maybe 4 or 5 thousand are older officials, seems to me etc.......
@sheepshanks
Perhaps you are correct, but my sentence said the same thing, but in a different way.
Taking the words out of context does nothing and could confuse people.
Again just go back and read the WHOLE sentence!
I read the whole sentence multiple times and was never exactly sure what it meant. Several people have been trying to give you constructive criticism, but you do not seem to be at all receptive.
@ren437
You did not understand that on ebay there was 15,000 officials, and maybe 4,000 or 5,000 (my guess) would be the older officials?
I understood what @1898 was trying to say. It was said a bit awkwardly but it was understandable. He was saying there are a lot of older officials on E-bay. It didn't really speak to the original comment that there were not many older officials showing up in stamp lots or collections. I've noticed the same thing with this site, not many older officials show up here. There are piles of them on E-Bay, as David noted, but I've found that in many cases the amount of shipping makes buying them or bidding on them unreasonable. There are a huge number there now on auction, as opposed to BIN, with reasonable shipping prices but that's not the normal state of affairs. I wish someone would post a few on SoR just to see how much interest there would be!
@1898
Had the sentence said
"So out of 15,000 perhaps there are ... maybe 4,000 or 5,000 [older officials] , seems to me there are plenty out there.",
I would have no problem understanding.
I still don't know what this means:
" right and proper orientation older officials"
and based on the other responses, I feel like I am not alone.
Roy
@roy
Makes no difference which words are used, the meaning is still there, you used what I said out of context which would be confusing to anyone!!!
...good grief all over again....
Oh good grief - between this silly conversation and the climate change rants on the other threads I’m beginning to feel guilty about recommending this site to a thousand people. Could we please go back to talking about stamps?
This is the first time I've ben reading posts where I have spent more time laughing than reading. It's very similar to Abbott and Costello's "who's on first" routine!!
https://www.wimp.com/abbott-costello-who ...
@philatelia
It was my posting that started this whole mess! I really regret this whole mess.
So let's do talk about stamps again, I promise not to mention the where to find Officials stamps again, I thought I was helping, then it turned into something else, a big waste of time!
1898
Hah! Good one Harvey! And - no worries 1898.
FYI - I don’t think using an @ for tagging works in this forum like it does in others at least it doesn’t on my ipad.
@philatelia
Have you found any of the older officials with any of the plate varieties, if so any you'd like to show?
Let’s talk about USA officials - the early Interior, War. dept, etc. I don’t remember reading any threads about these series.
I have been buying USA box lots and collections and there are almost always a few of everything - parcel post, postage dues, airs, revenues, territories etc. EXCEPT for the officials - excluding the modern set. They never seem to show up, but the catalog values aren’t crazy expensive. Have I just been unlucky or are these really that elusive?
Does anyone specialize in these issues?
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
I wouldn't say "specialize", but since they are in my US album I do collect them and you're right, they are difficult to find. Some are more expensive than others but none are grossly expensive. I probably have about two thirds of them but haven't added a new one in quite a while. I picked some up here but it's been a while. I don't keep spares to offer you but I have a feeling if one of the sellers here offered some there'd be quite a scramble for them!! My cutoff for US is 1977 so I have no interest in the newer ones that do show up occasionally. And I did have quite a few of the newer types that I passed on to my stamp dealer for credit. Good luck!
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
Hard to find them in decent condition too.
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
This is an indication of which ones seem to show up more often just by using what I have managed to find. Are your numbers similar?
Agriculture 2 / 9, Executive 0 / 5, Interior 10 / 10, Justice 3 / 10, Navy 7 / 11, Post office 9 / 10, State 7 / 11, Treasury 11 / 11, War 9 / 11, Postal Savings 5 / 6, Those done by the American Bank Note Company 6 / 27 Some groups are much harder to find, usually because of rarity and expense.
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
Just for fun I searched Ebay for officials, 15,000 listed, I checked the first two pages page 1 186, page 2 192 of the orientation older officials.
So out of 15,000 perhaps there are of the right and proper orientation older officials maybe 4,000 or 5,000, seems to me there are plenty out there.
Perhaps ebay should be checked for officials?
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
"Perhaps ebay should be checked for officials?"
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
"So out of 15,000 perhaps there are of the right and proper orientation older officials "
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@Roy
Go back to my posting and read the entire sentence!
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
I'd be willing to bet my lunch (...and it's steak!) That Roy HAS read, and reread everything in this thread.....he's thorough like that.
Your sentence is jibberish - maybe you should make an attempt to clarify it for everyone instead of making a seemingly angry retort - thank you in advance.
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@musicaman
You are correct it is jibberish what Roy said, but he took it out of context, all he had to do what reread the entire sentence!
I made no angry retort to anyone, I was trying to help him understand, simple!
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
Definition of "orientation" ,
1.The act of orienting or the state of being oriented.
2. Location or position relative to the points of the compass.
3.The construction of a church so that its longitudinal axis has an east-west direction with the main altar usually at the eastern end.
Not sure what way this applies to stamps, unless it means face upwards.
Your full sentence is :- So out of 15,000 perhaps there are of the right and proper orientation older officials maybe 4,000 or 5,000, seems to me there are plenty out there.
Possibly it makes more sense as follows:-
So out of 15,000 maybe 4 or 5 thousand are older officials, seems to me etc.......
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@sheepshanks
Perhaps you are correct, but my sentence said the same thing, but in a different way.
Taking the words out of context does nothing and could confuse people.
Again just go back and read the WHOLE sentence!
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
I read the whole sentence multiple times and was never exactly sure what it meant. Several people have been trying to give you constructive criticism, but you do not seem to be at all receptive.
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@ren437
You did not understand that on ebay there was 15,000 officials, and maybe 4,000 or 5,000 (my guess) would be the older officials?
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
I understood what @1898 was trying to say. It was said a bit awkwardly but it was understandable. He was saying there are a lot of older officials on E-bay. It didn't really speak to the original comment that there were not many older officials showing up in stamp lots or collections. I've noticed the same thing with this site, not many older officials show up here. There are piles of them on E-Bay, as David noted, but I've found that in many cases the amount of shipping makes buying them or bidding on them unreasonable. There are a huge number there now on auction, as opposed to BIN, with reasonable shipping prices but that's not the normal state of affairs. I wish someone would post a few on SoR just to see how much interest there would be!
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@1898
Had the sentence said
"So out of 15,000 perhaps there are ... maybe 4,000 or 5,000 [older officials] , seems to me there are plenty out there.",
I would have no problem understanding.
I still don't know what this means:
" right and proper orientation older officials"
and based on the other responses, I feel like I am not alone.
Roy
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@roy
Makes no difference which words are used, the meaning is still there, you used what I said out of context which would be confusing to anyone!!!
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
...good grief all over again....
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
Oh good grief - between this silly conversation and the climate change rants on the other threads I’m beginning to feel guilty about recommending this site to a thousand people. Could we please go back to talking about stamps?
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
This is the first time I've ben reading posts where I have spent more time laughing than reading. It's very similar to Abbott and Costello's "who's on first" routine!!
https://www.wimp.com/abbott-costello-who ...
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@philatelia
It was my posting that started this whole mess! I really regret this whole mess.
So let's do talk about stamps again, I promise not to mention the where to find Officials stamps again, I thought I was helping, then it turned into something else, a big waste of time!
1898
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
Hah! Good one Harvey! And - no worries 1898.
FYI - I don’t think using an @ for tagging works in this forum like it does in others at least it doesn’t on my ipad.
re: What’s up with older USA Official stamps?
@philatelia
Have you found any of the older officials with any of the plate varieties, if so any you'd like to show?