My thoughts would be that as used stamps they will always have that cut, so no not damaged.
It is really not any different to the UK security slit stamps which we collect mint/used with the slits.
Thank you.
I'll have to look up UK security slit stamps, interesting!
They are Machins that have security slits, in theory to leave parts behind if stripped or soaked from envelopes.
Here is an image of one.
Cut cancels are a form of cancellation. However, per the Scott catalogue, cut cancels normally do greatly diminish the value of the revenue stamp.
One area where "damaged" stamps are not valued less are the first issues from Afghanistan. Cancellation was done by tearing off the corner of the stamp.
Thank you Mr. Neiss!
The U.S.A. government directive of 1899 directed documentary stamps had to have 3 cuts as part of the cancel. My question is should these samps with the 3 cuts be considered damaged or not?
re: Is it considered or not damaged
My thoughts would be that as used stamps they will always have that cut, so no not damaged.
It is really not any different to the UK security slit stamps which we collect mint/used with the slits.
re: Is it considered or not damaged
Thank you.
I'll have to look up UK security slit stamps, interesting!
re: Is it considered or not damaged
They are Machins that have security slits, in theory to leave parts behind if stripped or soaked from envelopes.
Here is an image of one.
re: Is it considered or not damaged
Cut cancels are a form of cancellation. However, per the Scott catalogue, cut cancels normally do greatly diminish the value of the revenue stamp.
One area where "damaged" stamps are not valued less are the first issues from Afghanistan. Cancellation was done by tearing off the corner of the stamp.
re: Is it considered or not damaged
Thank you Mr. Neiss!