Larry's right!! I never really noticed that before. If you check Scott's 2010 Classic it tells all the differences between the two series, I'm sure other sources do as well but I'm too lazy to look!!!
DUH Evidently this 80 year old brain was to lazy to look also. If I had continued reading, I would have seen all the small print that told me the difference between the 1928 issues and the 1928 re-engraved issues.
Thanks for the help, saved me from mounting some stamps in the wrong places.
What makes me feel even dumber is that I have both complete series complete!
Scott #145 and Unitrade #145
Stamp on left appears to be over inked in area outside map of Newfoundland while the stamp on the right is much lighter although there appears to be darker areas in the border and other areas.
Scott makes no mention of a difference. Unitrade mentions re-entries exist over the entire design. Is what I am seeing a major re-entry? If so why is it only on a certain portion of the stamp?
re: Newfoundland Question
Larry's right!! I never really noticed that before. If you check Scott's 2010 Classic it tells all the differences between the two series, I'm sure other sources do as well but I'm too lazy to look!!!
re: Newfoundland Question
DUH Evidently this 80 year old brain was to lazy to look also. If I had continued reading, I would have seen all the small print that told me the difference between the 1928 issues and the 1928 re-engraved issues.
Thanks for the help, saved me from mounting some stamps in the wrong places.
re: Newfoundland Question
What makes me feel even dumber is that I have both complete series complete!