Login to Like
this post
Not recognized by Scott.
Is it printed on the back of a normal stamp? That would merit getting recognized.
Other than that, it looks like an under-inked printing, probably printer's waste.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Thanks Michael. It's gummed, so I'd say your printer's waste suggestion is probably correct
Login to Like
this post
I don't recall where I got this, but I'd like to know if it's recognised or just a nice EFO. Can anyone help please?
Login to Like
this post
re: 1953 New York Tercentenary 3c Dry Print
Not recognized by Scott.
Is it printed on the back of a normal stamp? That would merit getting recognized.
Other than that, it looks like an under-inked printing, probably printer's waste.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
re: 1953 New York Tercentenary 3c Dry Print
Thanks Michael. It's gummed, so I'd say your printer's waste suggestion is probably correct
Login to Like
this post