Here is a #8 from Stamp Smarter.
The image is really not good enough to tell with certainty. I enhanced it as best I could and my guess is that it is an 8. Post a better image if you want a more certain opinion.
Thank you for the reply. 600dpi Pictures
#8 type III (PL.4)
I could be wrong.
I recommend that you send it in to an expertise servicer. The APS, PF or PSE are a few that come to mind.
Thank you, I will send it in. It makes me fell good some one else came up with same #. Stamp Smarter is a great help for me to learn.
Keep on Stamping
Richard
I didn't just rely on the stamp smarter web site as my single source of information to identify what you may or may not have. I have a copy of the Scott US Specialized catalog and a copy of the Scott Identification Guide to US Stamps that covers the regular issues from 1847 to 1934.
Thank You
Keep on Stamping
Richard
#7 The bottom is not broken
Keep on Stamping
Richard
Is this a # 8 I'm not to good on the one cent.
I used Stamp Smarter.
re: #8 ?
The image is really not good enough to tell with certainty. I enhanced it as best I could and my guess is that it is an 8. Post a better image if you want a more certain opinion.
re: #8 ?
Thank you for the reply. 600dpi Pictures
re: #8 ?
#8 type III (PL.4)
I could be wrong.
I recommend that you send it in to an expertise servicer. The APS, PF or PSE are a few that come to mind.
re: #8 ?
Thank you, I will send it in. It makes me fell good some one else came up with same #. Stamp Smarter is a great help for me to learn.
Keep on Stamping
Richard
re: #8 ?
I didn't just rely on the stamp smarter web site as my single source of information to identify what you may or may not have. I have a copy of the Scott US Specialized catalog and a copy of the Scott Identification Guide to US Stamps that covers the regular issues from 1847 to 1934.
re: #8 ?
#7 The bottom is not broken
Keep on Stamping
Richard