'
Great piece; thanks for posting.
Not one use of the word "cover" or, for that matter, routings, censor marks, etc.
It's about the stamps, Stupid.
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey
PS: I've converted the scans to a single-file three-page PDF; anyone can PM for a copy.
This was also the subject of an editorial comment which I can post if anyone is interested. I always find it curious that posts about actual philatelic subjects generate far less interest than a debate about items and pricing in the auction. Of the top 3 posts on the forum excluding the diner what have we ....model railroads, overcharging and only sells to US...
PS Thanks for doing that ikeypikey
'
The slogan reads:
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Perhaps it should read:
For People Who Love To Talk About Each Other
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey
This article is from the Times Jan 30 1920. It sounds as tho at least a portion of the exhibit was meant to be a permanent part of the War Museum Library.
re: War issues at the Imperial War Museum
'
Great piece; thanks for posting.
Not one use of the word "cover" or, for that matter, routings, censor marks, etc.
It's about the stamps, Stupid.
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey
PS: I've converted the scans to a single-file three-page PDF; anyone can PM for a copy.
re: War issues at the Imperial War Museum
This was also the subject of an editorial comment which I can post if anyone is interested. I always find it curious that posts about actual philatelic subjects generate far less interest than a debate about items and pricing in the auction. Of the top 3 posts on the forum excluding the diner what have we ....model railroads, overcharging and only sells to US...
PS Thanks for doing that ikeypikey
re: War issues at the Imperial War Museum
'
The slogan reads:
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Perhaps it should read:
For People Who Love To Talk About Each Other
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey