Well, as a buyer, you unilaterally changed the terms of the sale. The seller is right to be upset with that since the seller did not agree to the change in terms. Therefore, the original terms still exist.
Did you pay the seller through PayPal? If so, the seller received nothing of what you paid due to the PayPal fees, and may have gone into the negative as well.
The correct thing to do would have been to contact the seller and request that the sale be canceled. The seller can always relist the now unsold item, and not be out any PayPal fees.
The existing rules do permit buyers and sellers to handle situations like this, provided that both parties agree.
Michael
Auctioneer
Strange yes, unless you paid 38 cents via paypal which would be in all probability a zero for the seller. That would explain why he wanted the entire $1.38. Personally my invoices should have the ability to pay via PAYPAL when under $5 blacked out so to speak. I really cannot say for certain if this is the case but based on what goes on with my invoices I believe this to be so.
Greg
"Personally my invoices should have the ability to pay via PAYPAL when under $5 blacked out so to speak."
I have to admit that I have no idea how PayPal works for small amounts like this 38 cent transaction. Yes, I used PayPal.
What I know is I pay CAD 1.20 to mail a small letter to the US and I cannot see how mailing a letter from the US to me will be cheaper than $1. In other words, I do not see how a seller paying proper postage will benefit from this transaction anyways.
I did pay the same seller for a similar 1 item transaction last month. No questions on his part, or an offer to hold the item till I get a few more stamps in the lot to make it worthwhile sending. Now again.
I am sure we, seller and buyer, should all have a satisfactory experience from a transaction. Maybe we can still look into the rules and tweak them up a bit to allow us to avoid headaches over peanuts?
Each transaction is separate from the other. It should not be presumed that because it worked in the past one way that it is all right to do it again the next time.
The following rule is found under the auction rules. It applies to auctions and approvals:
"A5. Sellers and buyers may mutually agree to alter the terms and conditions of any purchase. However, unless mutually agreed upon in writing (private messages are acceptable) by both parties, the changes are not valid, and no assumption may be made by either party that the other agreed to the changes.
"
Thanks Mike. This should work in theory but it still leaves the resolution of an issue (like this one) entirely in the hands of a seller, even if a buyer feels taken advantage of.
I probably have a number of sold items waiting for me to invoice the buyers for, and since the amounts are small, I have left them sitting till the buyer makes more purchases, or asks for an invoice. If neither of these two happens I will consider the sale void. It just makes sense to accommodate buyers and keep them all happy.
I like the way you think Cougar. Unfortunately I do not think Michael agrees. I know full well I have stamps sold that will never be paid for. It's just part of the business and as far as I am concerned, after 6 months they are now mine to do with as I please. I have quite a few in little envelopes myself. I have a person who told me he wanted to wait until he had enough to use PAYPAL to pay me. He has been working on that $5 for a year. By the time I invoice him the books are long gone, but I have the stamps.
Greg
As Micheal says:-
both buyers and sellers to communicate with each other to mutually ensure that the results of each transaction are satisfactory to both parties.
i think we see that a unilateral decision to break a contract has made both buyer and seller unhappy
there is simply NO way in which we can make a system work to the satisfaction of all, especially when some choose to change the terms of said system.
I am not usually a fan of TV shows other than News
or a Science channel, but one of my favorites is
"The People's Court" and it is amazing how many people
do not understand the essential rules of the
Commercial Code which I think is the same in both Canada
and the USA.
Deposits are not refundable unless agreed to in advance.
Buying a used auto is an "as is sale" and the occasional
"Lemon laws" only apply to new vehicles purchased from
a commercial dealer. Not in private sales.
Buying a ten or fifteen year old vehicle with close to
or in excess of 200,000 miles is not a guarantee of
lifetime free repairs.
When renting where a 30 day notice is required means
a full thirty days from the next "Rental Due Date"
preferably in writing not by voodoo hand signals.
And in must jurisdictions there are laws about informing
a vacating tennant the reason security is being held
in actual writing on paper listing the suspected damages
and estimated cost of repair. A salesman's "puffery"
(Verbal comments) are not warranties.
Trusting a person you only met on Craig's list or at an
auto shop's back room a few minutes before is not
a cause of action.
Unless you are a certified mechanic with six to ten years
experience spend a few dollars to hire a real automotive
technician (ASE certified) to examine a prospective
purchase before you sign the sales contract, not a few weeks
later when a knocking rod starts to wake the dead when you
drive past a cemetery.
Of course, as clearly stated here, one party to a contract
cannot unilaterally decide to change the terms of a contract
no matter how convenient it is. A thirty day warrantee
on an an auto is valid for precisely thirty daya, not
six months or the first oil change.
Your former friend calling you to get his or her money back
is not harassment, even if they get upset at your ducking
them and avoiding payment.
One more thing, when there is a written contract between
parties that clearly lay out the terms of the agreement,
prior oral statements, pinkie swearings or sincerely crossed
hearts are not admissible.
If more people understood these things and a few others
before they signed a written agreement, life would be much easier.
I am sure other members can add a few more miss-understood rules
As Judge Marilyn says; a loan of anything over a $1.oo should be
in writing, even on a piece of toilet paper, in crayon,
if there is any hope of repayment
As you say it was your mistake, I am not sure why you feel the seller must suffer the consequences of your mistake.
In my experience sellers are reasonable and may be inclined to work with you in situations like this if you talk to them about the situation.
Unilaterally changing the terms of sale is not your prerogative.
I cancel small sales for buyers all of the time - if the cost of the stamps is so much less than the shipping fee. I always give the buyer that option. Sometimes if they really want a stamp - they will pay the shipping fee but other times they take me up on my offer to just cancel the sale. That is the advantage of selling here over a commercial site - I have no fees to recover to cancel a sale here. Maybe I should not be so flexible ?
I did not know about the $5.00 paypal option - I may have to look into that but if a sale is at least 50 cents with the shipping fee - I tend to just about break even - with the PayPal fee.
Steve
It is increasingly harder to buy here. Sellers often do not post enough for sale to make a purchase feasible. Usually I will go through approval books or auction listings the first time by writing it down on paper. Then I add it up to make sure there's enough to actually purchase. Too much work.
The one time I let my guard down, a brief look at the approval book was promising.. I now have a 36 cent purchase hanging over my head. I went to see today and same seller hasn't posted any new books. In the auctions he had three lots, totaling less than 50 cents if I did the "Buy It Now" button.
"I cancel small sales for buyers all of the time - if the cost of the stamps is so much less than the shipping fee. I always give the buyer that option."
"I did not know about the $5.00 paypal option"
"Maybe I should not be so flexible?"
"It is increasingly harder to buy here. Sellers often do not post enough for sale to make a purchase feasible."
I won't take the bait, tempting as it is.........
Lol!!!
Way to take the high road, Greg....!
I didn't realize that it is so hard
to purchase things from the approval
or auction platform. And here I
have been picking out stamps faster
than I can mount them and create new
pages. I must be doing something wrong.
Quote:
""It is increasingly harder to buy here. Sellers often do not post enough for sale to make a purchase feasible."
Maybe it is time to be thankful for the "professional" sellers?
"
Is it just whining for the sake of whining or what?
Sellers say that after the first week or so after an approval book is posted sales drop off to bare minimum if there are any further sales at all. We put in programming to help clear out the stale approval books to make the others visible, then suddenly the length of time isn't enough.
You are given stats that books in the Closing Soon category have been and continue to be active from 4 to 11 months and counting. Previous stats given have shown some books have remained active for well over a year. That's longer than it used to be when the one year time period was used.
So what gives? WTF do you want? Explain it to me. Quit your snarky remarks and provide something useful instead.
Hey Michael,
I thought positive reinforcement (in a respectful way) was what the buyer in this case deserved.
I and many buyers here want bigger Books, and more of 'em, so that more than one or two people have some chance to buy inexpensive stamps.
If you can't play nice maybe you should - "Quit your snarky remarks"
You know full well what is best for this Club and it's Members and yet you and another 12 people changed the rules to the detriment of all members here.
And for the record, I have made many suggestions (to you) all of which have been ignored.
Cheers
Steve.
Nope nope nope. Not only am I not taking the bait, I will not even continue to look at this discussion for fear of too much temptation to weigh in.......
Greg
Steve, you had your chance, and you blew it.
"I and many buyers here want bigger Books, and more of 'em, so that more than one or two people have some chance to buy inexpensive stamps."
"You know full well what is best for this Club and it's Members and yet you and another 12 people changed the rules to the detriment of all members here."
"And for the record, I have made many suggestions (to you) all of which have been ignored."
Why don't we all just agree to disagree. There is no right or wrong here. Every one of us has our own favorite method of buying and/or selling. It is fine to make that favorite method known but once a suggestion is made let's not revisit it daily.
At the end of the day the only thing that is certain is that this is a club and that this club, like all successful clubs, has rules to follow. They may change, but they are rules and the rules of the day should be followed.
Why is there so much ink spread among these discussion pages on the buying and selling of stamps. Look at the statistics - a high percentage of the members of the club don't care what buyers and sellers do - we are invisible to them.
So why do they belong to the club? Because it is an incredible resource. Hit the "home" button above and explore a bit. Back issues of "The Rambler" and "The Gazette". We have articles, historic articles, exhibits and links to other resource sites...... and using the search function of the discussion pages yields detailed information on almost every facet of our hobby. Got a question on Heligoland - there are over a dozen threads that have some information.
I probably shouldn't be commenting since I don't sell here anymore, but it is discouraging that we don't recognize that this is probably the only sales venue where change is possible - don't like it - tell Ebay what you think of their site and listen to their response - silence. The same holds true for most commercial sites. I loved the site architecture of Bidstart - the ease of one page with all of the current and historical listing and financial data available with the push of one button. I hate the format of of Hipstamp - drill down architecture, no index to assist in finding anything, going through the laborious process of creating separate csv files for any piece of data that could be done with one click of the mouse before. I have made my thoughs known both on the forums as well as in private emails to Mark - guess what, it's not going to change and I have to accept that or move on to ???????????????/
That's my two cents for the day
Amen, Carol....amen.
I only hope everyone reads this and gives it the consideration it deserves!
Well said.
I'll weigh in only because it is off topic
"going through the laborious process of creating separate csv files"
Hi Greg,
I agree on the bulk uploader. My problem is when I want to find the value of stamps sold from a particular country, or the value of stamps listed in a country or area. Or say the value of covers listed, or stamps of Europe, etc. That was all available on a one click basis, even for a specific time period so you could plot trends.Granted it was more important when I had a lot of stamps listed but even with 7500 +- it's a nice thing to know.
It also makes it cumbersome in the event of an audit.. playing around with csv files to answer questions is not what I want to be doing .. even retrieving information during tax preparation is cumbersome... I probably worry about details a bit too much but the details have come in handy a couple of times in the past.....
Greg, in the auction listing process here, when you list one lot at a time, you can put them in an "On Hold" status. When you are ready, you can then activate all of the auction lots that are on hold, and they'll be available for bidding.
To my knowledge, the bulk uploader doesn't have that option. I don't know if it's possible to program that into the bulk uploader. That would be a Tim question.
The last change to the bulk uploader was made in 2016 to permit adding the country name. I don't know if other program tweaking was done to the uploader at that time.
"Sellers say that after the first week or so after an approval book is posted sales drop off to bare minimum if there are any further sales at all."
Michael I did do that. What happened the three times I did it (we were going to be on vacation) was that the auctions did not start in the order that I placed uploaded them. They started all at once which was mixed up and a pain because a) all my penny auctions start first every week and b) the order that they ended did not match the sheets I make up weekly for auctions. Instead I now run some for 14 days, and some for 10 (normal). If we were going to be away for a while I'd just do the work via my laptop while on vacation. We rarely take a vacation for more than 7 days.
Greg
Yes, that is a limitation of the system. Thanks.
This thread saw quite the development since I last checked on it!
And in the meantime I receive more of those pesky 30 cent invoices garnished with shipping fees and additional charges (to offset Ebay fees?).
What can I say? No problem, I will pay them. I can lose a beer here and there, but I can say that those I pay them to can be sure this is the last time I buy anything from them. Hope this doesn't go against the rules.
COMMUNICATION between buyer and seller is the key.
If you buy three stamps and expect to buy more later from the same seller TELL THEM!
If you don't know if you will, TELL THEM, ask them to hold fire on the invoice just in case. Most sellers here will wait BUT DO NOT expect the seller to wait/hold for weeks, that is downright bad manners on the buyers part.
Sellers are not mind readers, they are human! Just because you receive an invoice it may not be a demand for payment just a note from the seller to the buyer to let them know how much you have spent and the shipping costs. SELLERS can amend invoices or add to the invoice if more items are purchased.
Treat people the way that you would like to be treated and you won't go far wrong.
COMMUNICATION, COMMUNICATION, COMMUNICATION.
Came across an interesting case recently. I bought a set of stamps - Zambia - cattle set of 4. Since it takes time to get the stamps sometimes, I unknowingly bought the set two more times. Yesterday, after I had received the first two sets, I had seller #2 invoice me for $1.38, of which 0.38 was the set of stamps and the $1 was the postage.
Since I did not need the stamps any more, I paid seller #2 the 0.38 I owed him for the stamps and asked him to keep the stamps and not mail me anything. I marked the item as received.
Well guess what. The guy is unhappy! He somehow believes that mailing me the stamps is more beneficial to him. From that I can only surmise he has a pile of unfranked postage he is trying to put into use.
Can we have an adjustment to the rules where if the value of the stamps purchased is less than , say $1, the buyer is allowed to pay for the stamps only and walk away?
Supporting a transaction that clearly encourages a seller to break State rules is, I believe, not a mandate of this forum.
re: Buying rules
Well, as a buyer, you unilaterally changed the terms of the sale. The seller is right to be upset with that since the seller did not agree to the change in terms. Therefore, the original terms still exist.
Did you pay the seller through PayPal? If so, the seller received nothing of what you paid due to the PayPal fees, and may have gone into the negative as well.
The correct thing to do would have been to contact the seller and request that the sale be canceled. The seller can always relist the now unsold item, and not be out any PayPal fees.
The existing rules do permit buyers and sellers to handle situations like this, provided that both parties agree.
Michael
Auctioneer
re: Buying rules
Strange yes, unless you paid 38 cents via paypal which would be in all probability a zero for the seller. That would explain why he wanted the entire $1.38. Personally my invoices should have the ability to pay via PAYPAL when under $5 blacked out so to speak. I really cannot say for certain if this is the case but based on what goes on with my invoices I believe this to be so.
Greg
re: Buying rules
"Personally my invoices should have the ability to pay via PAYPAL when under $5 blacked out so to speak."
re: Buying rules
I have to admit that I have no idea how PayPal works for small amounts like this 38 cent transaction. Yes, I used PayPal.
What I know is I pay CAD 1.20 to mail a small letter to the US and I cannot see how mailing a letter from the US to me will be cheaper than $1. In other words, I do not see how a seller paying proper postage will benefit from this transaction anyways.
I did pay the same seller for a similar 1 item transaction last month. No questions on his part, or an offer to hold the item till I get a few more stamps in the lot to make it worthwhile sending. Now again.
I am sure we, seller and buyer, should all have a satisfactory experience from a transaction. Maybe we can still look into the rules and tweak them up a bit to allow us to avoid headaches over peanuts?
re: Buying rules
Each transaction is separate from the other. It should not be presumed that because it worked in the past one way that it is all right to do it again the next time.
The following rule is found under the auction rules. It applies to auctions and approvals:
"A5. Sellers and buyers may mutually agree to alter the terms and conditions of any purchase. However, unless mutually agreed upon in writing (private messages are acceptable) by both parties, the changes are not valid, and no assumption may be made by either party that the other agreed to the changes.
"
re: Buying rules
Thanks Mike. This should work in theory but it still leaves the resolution of an issue (like this one) entirely in the hands of a seller, even if a buyer feels taken advantage of.
I probably have a number of sold items waiting for me to invoice the buyers for, and since the amounts are small, I have left them sitting till the buyer makes more purchases, or asks for an invoice. If neither of these two happens I will consider the sale void. It just makes sense to accommodate buyers and keep them all happy.
re: Buying rules
I like the way you think Cougar. Unfortunately I do not think Michael agrees. I know full well I have stamps sold that will never be paid for. It's just part of the business and as far as I am concerned, after 6 months they are now mine to do with as I please. I have quite a few in little envelopes myself. I have a person who told me he wanted to wait until he had enough to use PAYPAL to pay me. He has been working on that $5 for a year. By the time I invoice him the books are long gone, but I have the stamps.
Greg
re: Buying rules
As Micheal says:-
both buyers and sellers to communicate with each other to mutually ensure that the results of each transaction are satisfactory to both parties.
re: Buying rules
i think we see that a unilateral decision to break a contract has made both buyer and seller unhappy
there is simply NO way in which we can make a system work to the satisfaction of all, especially when some choose to change the terms of said system.
re: Buying rules
I am not usually a fan of TV shows other than News
or a Science channel, but one of my favorites is
"The People's Court" and it is amazing how many people
do not understand the essential rules of the
Commercial Code which I think is the same in both Canada
and the USA.
Deposits are not refundable unless agreed to in advance.
Buying a used auto is an "as is sale" and the occasional
"Lemon laws" only apply to new vehicles purchased from
a commercial dealer. Not in private sales.
Buying a ten or fifteen year old vehicle with close to
or in excess of 200,000 miles is not a guarantee of
lifetime free repairs.
When renting where a 30 day notice is required means
a full thirty days from the next "Rental Due Date"
preferably in writing not by voodoo hand signals.
And in must jurisdictions there are laws about informing
a vacating tennant the reason security is being held
in actual writing on paper listing the suspected damages
and estimated cost of repair. A salesman's "puffery"
(Verbal comments) are not warranties.
Trusting a person you only met on Craig's list or at an
auto shop's back room a few minutes before is not
a cause of action.
Unless you are a certified mechanic with six to ten years
experience spend a few dollars to hire a real automotive
technician (ASE certified) to examine a prospective
purchase before you sign the sales contract, not a few weeks
later when a knocking rod starts to wake the dead when you
drive past a cemetery.
Of course, as clearly stated here, one party to a contract
cannot unilaterally decide to change the terms of a contract
no matter how convenient it is. A thirty day warrantee
on an an auto is valid for precisely thirty daya, not
six months or the first oil change.
Your former friend calling you to get his or her money back
is not harassment, even if they get upset at your ducking
them and avoiding payment.
One more thing, when there is a written contract between
parties that clearly lay out the terms of the agreement,
prior oral statements, pinkie swearings or sincerely crossed
hearts are not admissible.
If more people understood these things and a few others
before they signed a written agreement, life would be much easier.
I am sure other members can add a few more miss-understood rules
As Judge Marilyn says; a loan of anything over a $1.oo should be
in writing, even on a piece of toilet paper, in crayon,
if there is any hope of repayment
re: Buying rules
As you say it was your mistake, I am not sure why you feel the seller must suffer the consequences of your mistake.
In my experience sellers are reasonable and may be inclined to work with you in situations like this if you talk to them about the situation.
Unilaterally changing the terms of sale is not your prerogative.
re: Buying rules
I cancel small sales for buyers all of the time - if the cost of the stamps is so much less than the shipping fee. I always give the buyer that option. Sometimes if they really want a stamp - they will pay the shipping fee but other times they take me up on my offer to just cancel the sale. That is the advantage of selling here over a commercial site - I have no fees to recover to cancel a sale here. Maybe I should not be so flexible ?
I did not know about the $5.00 paypal option - I may have to look into that but if a sale is at least 50 cents with the shipping fee - I tend to just about break even - with the PayPal fee.
Steve
re: Buying rules
It is increasingly harder to buy here. Sellers often do not post enough for sale to make a purchase feasible. Usually I will go through approval books or auction listings the first time by writing it down on paper. Then I add it up to make sure there's enough to actually purchase. Too much work.
The one time I let my guard down, a brief look at the approval book was promising.. I now have a 36 cent purchase hanging over my head. I went to see today and same seller hasn't posted any new books. In the auctions he had three lots, totaling less than 50 cents if I did the "Buy It Now" button.
re: Buying rules
"I cancel small sales for buyers all of the time - if the cost of the stamps is so much less than the shipping fee. I always give the buyer that option."
"I did not know about the $5.00 paypal option"
"Maybe I should not be so flexible?"
re: Buying rules
"It is increasingly harder to buy here. Sellers often do not post enough for sale to make a purchase feasible."
re: Buying rules
I won't take the bait, tempting as it is.........
re: Buying rules
Lol!!!
Way to take the high road, Greg....!
re: Buying rules
I didn't realize that it is so hard
to purchase things from the approval
or auction platform. And here I
have been picking out stamps faster
than I can mount them and create new
pages. I must be doing something wrong.
re: Buying rules
Quote:
""It is increasingly harder to buy here. Sellers often do not post enough for sale to make a purchase feasible."
Maybe it is time to be thankful for the "professional" sellers?
"
re: Buying rules
Is it just whining for the sake of whining or what?
Sellers say that after the first week or so after an approval book is posted sales drop off to bare minimum if there are any further sales at all. We put in programming to help clear out the stale approval books to make the others visible, then suddenly the length of time isn't enough.
You are given stats that books in the Closing Soon category have been and continue to be active from 4 to 11 months and counting. Previous stats given have shown some books have remained active for well over a year. That's longer than it used to be when the one year time period was used.
So what gives? WTF do you want? Explain it to me. Quit your snarky remarks and provide something useful instead.
re: Buying rules
Hey Michael,
I thought positive reinforcement (in a respectful way) was what the buyer in this case deserved.
I and many buyers here want bigger Books, and more of 'em, so that more than one or two people have some chance to buy inexpensive stamps.
If you can't play nice maybe you should - "Quit your snarky remarks"
You know full well what is best for this Club and it's Members and yet you and another 12 people changed the rules to the detriment of all members here.
And for the record, I have made many suggestions (to you) all of which have been ignored.
Cheers
Steve.
re: Buying rules
Nope nope nope. Not only am I not taking the bait, I will not even continue to look at this discussion for fear of too much temptation to weigh in.......
Greg
re: Buying rules
Steve, you had your chance, and you blew it.
"I and many buyers here want bigger Books, and more of 'em, so that more than one or two people have some chance to buy inexpensive stamps."
"You know full well what is best for this Club and it's Members and yet you and another 12 people changed the rules to the detriment of all members here."
"And for the record, I have made many suggestions (to you) all of which have been ignored."
re: Buying rules
Why don't we all just agree to disagree. There is no right or wrong here. Every one of us has our own favorite method of buying and/or selling. It is fine to make that favorite method known but once a suggestion is made let's not revisit it daily.
At the end of the day the only thing that is certain is that this is a club and that this club, like all successful clubs, has rules to follow. They may change, but they are rules and the rules of the day should be followed.
Why is there so much ink spread among these discussion pages on the buying and selling of stamps. Look at the statistics - a high percentage of the members of the club don't care what buyers and sellers do - we are invisible to them.
So why do they belong to the club? Because it is an incredible resource. Hit the "home" button above and explore a bit. Back issues of "The Rambler" and "The Gazette". We have articles, historic articles, exhibits and links to other resource sites...... and using the search function of the discussion pages yields detailed information on almost every facet of our hobby. Got a question on Heligoland - there are over a dozen threads that have some information.
I probably shouldn't be commenting since I don't sell here anymore, but it is discouraging that we don't recognize that this is probably the only sales venue where change is possible - don't like it - tell Ebay what you think of their site and listen to their response - silence. The same holds true for most commercial sites. I loved the site architecture of Bidstart - the ease of one page with all of the current and historical listing and financial data available with the push of one button. I hate the format of of Hipstamp - drill down architecture, no index to assist in finding anything, going through the laborious process of creating separate csv files for any piece of data that could be done with one click of the mouse before. I have made my thoughs known both on the forums as well as in private emails to Mark - guess what, it's not going to change and I have to accept that or move on to ???????????????/
That's my two cents for the day
re: Buying rules
Amen, Carol....amen.
I only hope everyone reads this and gives it the consideration it deserves!
Well said.
re: Buying rules
I'll weigh in only because it is off topic
"going through the laborious process of creating separate csv files"
re: Buying rules
Hi Greg,
I agree on the bulk uploader. My problem is when I want to find the value of stamps sold from a particular country, or the value of stamps listed in a country or area. Or say the value of covers listed, or stamps of Europe, etc. That was all available on a one click basis, even for a specific time period so you could plot trends.Granted it was more important when I had a lot of stamps listed but even with 7500 +- it's a nice thing to know.
It also makes it cumbersome in the event of an audit.. playing around with csv files to answer questions is not what I want to be doing .. even retrieving information during tax preparation is cumbersome... I probably worry about details a bit too much but the details have come in handy a couple of times in the past.....
re: Buying rules
Greg, in the auction listing process here, when you list one lot at a time, you can put them in an "On Hold" status. When you are ready, you can then activate all of the auction lots that are on hold, and they'll be available for bidding.
To my knowledge, the bulk uploader doesn't have that option. I don't know if it's possible to program that into the bulk uploader. That would be a Tim question.
The last change to the bulk uploader was made in 2016 to permit adding the country name. I don't know if other program tweaking was done to the uploader at that time.
re: Buying rules
"Sellers say that after the first week or so after an approval book is posted sales drop off to bare minimum if there are any further sales at all."
re: Buying rules
Michael I did do that. What happened the three times I did it (we were going to be on vacation) was that the auctions did not start in the order that I placed uploaded them. They started all at once which was mixed up and a pain because a) all my penny auctions start first every week and b) the order that they ended did not match the sheets I make up weekly for auctions. Instead I now run some for 14 days, and some for 10 (normal). If we were going to be away for a while I'd just do the work via my laptop while on vacation. We rarely take a vacation for more than 7 days.
Greg
re: Buying rules
Yes, that is a limitation of the system. Thanks.
re: Buying rules
This thread saw quite the development since I last checked on it!
And in the meantime I receive more of those pesky 30 cent invoices garnished with shipping fees and additional charges (to offset Ebay fees?).
What can I say? No problem, I will pay them. I can lose a beer here and there, but I can say that those I pay them to can be sure this is the last time I buy anything from them. Hope this doesn't go against the rules.
re: Buying rules
COMMUNICATION between buyer and seller is the key.
If you buy three stamps and expect to buy more later from the same seller TELL THEM!
If you don't know if you will, TELL THEM, ask them to hold fire on the invoice just in case. Most sellers here will wait BUT DO NOT expect the seller to wait/hold for weeks, that is downright bad manners on the buyers part.
Sellers are not mind readers, they are human! Just because you receive an invoice it may not be a demand for payment just a note from the seller to the buyer to let them know how much you have spent and the shipping costs. SELLERS can amend invoices or add to the invoice if more items are purchased.
Treat people the way that you would like to be treated and you won't go far wrong.
COMMUNICATION, COMMUNICATION, COMMUNICATION.