remainder sheets abound , so cancels need to be expertised.
philaseiten.de offers accurate cancel dbase ...
many forgeries exist ... goto ebay.de/
search :
1923 BPP
Hi Everyone;
Don't buy any of the used ones. They can all be faked.
In 2007 I saw a seller offering homemade rubber stamps with authentic looking German cancellations.
They were made from inexpensive kits.
When I confronted the seller, asking him to take them down before I reported him, he refused. He said
if I look closely, he added an extra embellishment to them so they could be easily told apart from real ones.
I told him that they could be positioned to have the added object fall off the edge of the stamp
and not show up at all.
He never answered my response, and FeeBay never did anything.
Further research showed that inexpensive kits ($20-$25) were selling on eBay for making your own
rubber stamps.
This is mostly part of the rubber stamping hobby, for boring people with even more boring lives than ours!
So having a metal stamp from a bombed out post office is totally not necessary, and there would be
no way of collecting these, except on cover and then only passed by well trusted authenticators.
Just sortin'....
TuskenRaider
"This is mostly part of the rubber stamping hobby, for boring people with even more boring lives than ours!"
A sure way to tell if a cancel from between 1916 -1923 is false, is that there must be a "V" or "N" after the Date/time: No "V" or "N" = False. There is also a publication from the Infla Berlin group "Band 13, Falschstempel der Inflation" that lists all of the known false cancelations. The tricky thing is as mentioned by LarryG are the authentic stamps used on these. I would think that the experts can still tell these apart by the ink being used.
This is my main collecting area and I have about 99.9% of all my used stamps proofed. After ca. 15 years collecting these, I have only come across 3 bad cancelations. I like to think, if they look to good, don´t buy unless newly proofed.
.
Here is a good example of a cancelation that is known to be back dated.
The cancelation "CÖLN * 12 f" is known to be backdated as per the Infla book.
I had this 5 000 000 00 Mark stamp proofed, it turned out to be good.
Note the bottom of the cancel. CÖLN * 12 f.
I've always been under the impression that 90% or more of the cancellations on these stamps were fake. I find you statement that you specialize in them but have only found 3 forged cancellations, hard to understand. To those that have not heard them, there are stories of people going to the post office with wheel barrows full of cash to buy a stamps to use on mail. This extreme inflation caused used examples to be very scarce and subsequently driving their value up. It is not hard to understand how this invited the forger to fake cancels to deceive collectors.
Your statement that an N or S should follow the date to be a qualifier of legitimacy is helpful but you would think most forgers would know this and include it on their own device. I checked one of my pages (below) and all of the readable cancels did in deed have an "N" after the date. Although this does not mean they are legitimate
but only not fake considering one aspect.
While most of the forged cancellations were probably contemporary there's been nearly 100 years for later forgers to do their handy work on these, especially because there are still many millions of uncancelled stamps in circulation. Surely no publication could ever show all the forged cancellations out there.
For reference below is one of my pages showing the stamps of this era. As I collect both I've just been stacking them, usually mint on top of used mainly to show best the stamp.
However some are shown used on top of mint, many of these clearly show the "N" after date.
https://www.delcampe.net/en_GB/collectables/search?term=rolf+tworek&search_mode=phrase&excluded_terms=&country=NET&is_searchable_in_descriptions=1&is_searchable_in_translations=0&show_type=all&display_ongoing=ongoing&started_days=&ended_hours=&min_price=&max_price=&order=price_asc&seller_localisation=world&blacklisted_sellers_included=0
I cannot speak for Opa, but my interpretation of his post:
1. Of all the examples Opa submitted for expertization, only 3 came back as fakes (in other words, skilled enough to filter out the likely fakes so as to only submit ones with near 100% certainty of being genuine)
2. Cancels without the letter are from fake cancelers, but having the letter in the cancel does not mean it is genuine.
I assume the latter point applies only to the general post office cancelers, and not to special cancels.
I also assume the really big problem is with fake (back-dated) cancels made with genuine cancelling devices. And so some of the cancel/dates listed are for ones known to exist as fake or back-dated cancels. That does not mean a cancel with that date is fake -- it may still be genuine, as shown in the example Opa posted.
One of the key factors for experts to distinguish fake back-dated cancels is that the wrong type of ink was used. So in additional to the Infla list to warn of questionable cancels/dates, the type of ink should also be noted. Not an expert, but my non-scientific observations on the ink are as follows and I would appreciate any members chiming in to comment on these observations (just general observations, not absolute rules or criteria):
1. Genuine postal cancels used an oily ink (referring only to general post office cancels, not special cancels which I have seen to clearly use non-oily ink). This often results in the following...
2. ...genuine cancels often "bleed" through slightly or significantly to the back-side
3. ...genuine cancels often "spread out" giving the appearance of blurriness or unsharp lines/curves, sometimes even resulting in "blotching"
4. ...a lot of the genuine cancels that I've seen tend NOT to be dark black, and I was wondering if this is caused in part by the "bleeding" out/thru
Again, I do not present these as criteria, but was wondering how often that is seen in genuine postal cancels of that time period. Any comments appreciated, as well as any correction to my understanding -- I sort of assume the basic info I was given was correct/valid.
(and of course, I do know that an oily ink doesn't guarantee that the cancel is genuine)
"I cannot speak for Opa, but my interpretation of his post:
1. Of all the examples Opa submitted for expertization, only 3 came back as fakes (in other words, skilled enough to filter out the likely fakes so as to only submit ones with near 100% certainty of being genuine)"
Yes, that would make sense but doesn't really quite read that way. I to assume they are all fake even though that might be a bit harsh. Many of the used examples do not cat for much more than mint examples which would give the forger little incentive. It has always been a difficult area to deal with which require a lot of money buying certs to be content with what you have. Much easier just to collect these mint but is one of the areas that make it hard for used only collectors.
Scanned below are used blocks from my WW block collection. After reading through this discussion, I guess these are probably fakes, too.
Linus
Linus, without checking the cancel dates/types, I would have put them in the possible genuine pile considering the ink appearance. That's the main reason for my post. On the genuine general postal cancels that I've seen, the ink color/spread typically has the appearance shown in your examples.
I am no expert at all on determining whether these are fake or real cancels. I just put them in my collection, and enjoy looking at them. I just discovered that block of 10 with serrate roulette 13-and-one-half perfs this past weekend in a shoe box of worldwide I bought from the Stamp Out Cancer Auction years ago. I finally got down to the bottom of the shoe box and this block was off paper with a bunch of mint German stamps stuck to it. Using my spray bottle of water and a lot of patience, I managed to get it freed. It would be nice if it was real, as the 2016 Scott catalog value for Germany 305 used is $7.50 per stamp, or $75.00 for the whole block of 10!
Linus
I just spent about 1 1/2 hours writing a response. Then I hit a side button on my new mouse and everything was gone. So here we go again.
" 1. Of all the examples Opa submitted for expertization, only 3 came back as fakes (in other words, skilled enough to filter out the likely fakes so as to only submit ones with near 100% certainty of being genuine)
2. Cancels without the letter are from fake cancelers, but having the letter in the cancel does not mean it is genuine.
"
"
1. Genuine postal cancels used an oily ink (referring only to general post office cancels, not special cancels which I have seen to clearly use non-oily ink). This often results in the following...
2. ...genuine cancels often "bleed" through slightly or significantly to the back-side
3. ...genuine cancels often "spread out" giving the appearance of blurriness or unsharp lines/curves, sometimes even resulting in "blotching"
4. ...a lot of the genuine cancels that I've seen tend NOT to be dark black, and I was wondering if this is caused in part by the "bleeding" out/thru
"
"
I've always been under the impression that 90% or more of the cancellations on these stamps were fake. I find you statement that you specialize in them but have only found 3 forged cancellations, hard to understand. To those that have not heard them, there are stories of people going to the post office with wheel barrows full of cash to buy a stamps to use on mail. This extreme inflation caused used examples to be very scarce and subsequently driving their value up. It is not hard to understand how this invited the forger to fake cancels to deceive collectors.
Your statement that an N or S should follow the date to be a qualifier of legitimacy is helpful but you would think most forgers would know this and include it on their own device. I checked one of my pages (below) and all of the readable cancels did in deed have an "N" after the date. Although this does not mean they are legitimate
"
"Scanned below are used blocks from my WW block collection. After reading through this discussion, I guess these are probably fakes, too.
Linus
"
Opa - Thank you for your opinion. I feel a little better that these may be real cancels. I also have this cover below from the year 1925 that was sent from Frankfort to the same Paul L. Hess in Kansas City, Missouri, USA. It helps to support the probability that the previous Frankfort cover was real.
Linus
BPP rates ...
https://www.bpp.de/en/sonderpruefordnung-infla.html
Looking through my other blocks from Germany, I found this one scanned below dated 11-11-18. This one is listed in the Scott catalog under France, Occupation stamps, cat. number N21, used $2.75 each stamp if real, $22.00 for the whole block. From what I have learned from everyone contributing to this post, I think this cancel is probably fake. It looks too neat and perfect, ink is thin and uniform, not blotchy and uneven, and the cancels are carefully placed at the corners of each stamp. What is your opinion?
Thanks to all who have replied on this topic,
Linus
Linus, I defer to the others with more experience/knowledge, but I'd be shocked if that block of 8 was genuine postally used.
If you've ever seen whole sheets of these, you'd see your block is typical example of something torn from a full sheet of favor-cancels or fake back-dated cancels. The gum is soaked off to make it look used rather than CTO. I have a couple of these, although not for that issue. I think I might have a scan stored somewhere that I'll try to post later.
That is what I thought, also. It looks like it was taken from a CTO sheet, and there is no gum on the back just as you describe. This one looks too perfect to be real.
Linus
OK, here is an "example" -- I know it's the wrong time period, but just to give you an idea:
I run across these in large dealer mixes, and on occasion have seen them in auction lots as well. If I remember correctly, I have several of these panes, all with the exact same cancel. Hope the person who manufactured these didn't get carpal tunnel...
@ Linus
Can´t tell you if the cancel is real or not but it says "POSTUBERWACHUNGSSTELLE" which means Postal monitoring or Postal censorship.
This site might give you an idea about the cancel. Look at the 5th postcard from the top.
http://www.heimatsammlung.de/ganzsachen/deutsche-besetzungsausgaben/deutsche-besetzungsausgaben.htm
Thanks for the link and the translation, Opa. It is the same cancel with 33, only on a postcard. Interesting.
Hi Everyone;
Thanks Opa for that little bit of info!
I now have two sets of rubber stamps. One set has had an 'N' added and the other set has the 'V' added.
When you place your rubber stamp order, please specify either N or V, so I can ship the correct version.
I also have the Mighty Mack bridge for sale this week. It's the one that connects the upper and lower halves of Michigan.
Just sortin'....
TuskenRaider
A scan of killer bar cancel that I mentioned earlier.
This thing is not going into my main collection.
"Thanks for the link and the translation, Opa. It is the same cancel with 33, only on a postcard. Interesting."
i see many "used" inflation period stamps for sale on EBay at relatively high prices compared to mint stamps.
I wonder how many are really used.
A friend who was a teen in Germany at the end of the war told me how he obtained a hand cancel from a bombed post office and cancelled sheets of the inflation era stamps.
What percentage of the cancelled stamps for sale are authentic?
LarryG
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
remainder sheets abound , so cancels need to be expertised.
philaseiten.de offers accurate cancel dbase ...
many forgeries exist ... goto ebay.de/
search :
1923 BPP
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Hi Everyone;
Don't buy any of the used ones. They can all be faked.
In 2007 I saw a seller offering homemade rubber stamps with authentic looking German cancellations.
They were made from inexpensive kits.
When I confronted the seller, asking him to take them down before I reported him, he refused. He said
if I look closely, he added an extra embellishment to them so they could be easily told apart from real ones.
I told him that they could be positioned to have the added object fall off the edge of the stamp
and not show up at all.
He never answered my response, and FeeBay never did anything.
Further research showed that inexpensive kits ($20-$25) were selling on eBay for making your own
rubber stamps.
This is mostly part of the rubber stamping hobby, for boring people with even more boring lives than ours!
So having a metal stamp from a bombed out post office is totally not necessary, and there would be
no way of collecting these, except on cover and then only passed by well trusted authenticators.
Just sortin'....
TuskenRaider
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
"This is mostly part of the rubber stamping hobby, for boring people with even more boring lives than ours!"
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
A sure way to tell if a cancel from between 1916 -1923 is false, is that there must be a "V" or "N" after the Date/time: No "V" or "N" = False. There is also a publication from the Infla Berlin group "Band 13, Falschstempel der Inflation" that lists all of the known false cancelations. The tricky thing is as mentioned by LarryG are the authentic stamps used on these. I would think that the experts can still tell these apart by the ink being used.
This is my main collecting area and I have about 99.9% of all my used stamps proofed. After ca. 15 years collecting these, I have only come across 3 bad cancelations. I like to think, if they look to good, don´t buy unless newly proofed.
.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Here is a good example of a cancelation that is known to be back dated.
The cancelation "CÖLN * 12 f" is known to be backdated as per the Infla book.
I had this 5 000 000 00 Mark stamp proofed, it turned out to be good.
Note the bottom of the cancel. CÖLN * 12 f.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
I've always been under the impression that 90% or more of the cancellations on these stamps were fake. I find you statement that you specialize in them but have only found 3 forged cancellations, hard to understand. To those that have not heard them, there are stories of people going to the post office with wheel barrows full of cash to buy a stamps to use on mail. This extreme inflation caused used examples to be very scarce and subsequently driving their value up. It is not hard to understand how this invited the forger to fake cancels to deceive collectors.
Your statement that an N or S should follow the date to be a qualifier of legitimacy is helpful but you would think most forgers would know this and include it on their own device. I checked one of my pages (below) and all of the readable cancels did in deed have an "N" after the date. Although this does not mean they are legitimate
but only not fake considering one aspect.
While most of the forged cancellations were probably contemporary there's been nearly 100 years for later forgers to do their handy work on these, especially because there are still many millions of uncancelled stamps in circulation. Surely no publication could ever show all the forged cancellations out there.
For reference below is one of my pages showing the stamps of this era. As I collect both I've just been stacking them, usually mint on top of used mainly to show best the stamp.
However some are shown used on top of mint, many of these clearly show the "N" after date.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
https://www.delcampe.net/en_GB/collectables/search?term=rolf+tworek&search_mode=phrase&excluded_terms=&country=NET&is_searchable_in_descriptions=1&is_searchable_in_translations=0&show_type=all&display_ongoing=ongoing&started_days=&ended_hours=&min_price=&max_price=&order=price_asc&seller_localisation=world&blacklisted_sellers_included=0
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
I cannot speak for Opa, but my interpretation of his post:
1. Of all the examples Opa submitted for expertization, only 3 came back as fakes (in other words, skilled enough to filter out the likely fakes so as to only submit ones with near 100% certainty of being genuine)
2. Cancels without the letter are from fake cancelers, but having the letter in the cancel does not mean it is genuine.
I assume the latter point applies only to the general post office cancelers, and not to special cancels.
I also assume the really big problem is with fake (back-dated) cancels made with genuine cancelling devices. And so some of the cancel/dates listed are for ones known to exist as fake or back-dated cancels. That does not mean a cancel with that date is fake -- it may still be genuine, as shown in the example Opa posted.
One of the key factors for experts to distinguish fake back-dated cancels is that the wrong type of ink was used. So in additional to the Infla list to warn of questionable cancels/dates, the type of ink should also be noted. Not an expert, but my non-scientific observations on the ink are as follows and I would appreciate any members chiming in to comment on these observations (just general observations, not absolute rules or criteria):
1. Genuine postal cancels used an oily ink (referring only to general post office cancels, not special cancels which I have seen to clearly use non-oily ink). This often results in the following...
2. ...genuine cancels often "bleed" through slightly or significantly to the back-side
3. ...genuine cancels often "spread out" giving the appearance of blurriness or unsharp lines/curves, sometimes even resulting in "blotching"
4. ...a lot of the genuine cancels that I've seen tend NOT to be dark black, and I was wondering if this is caused in part by the "bleeding" out/thru
Again, I do not present these as criteria, but was wondering how often that is seen in genuine postal cancels of that time period. Any comments appreciated, as well as any correction to my understanding -- I sort of assume the basic info I was given was correct/valid.
(and of course, I do know that an oily ink doesn't guarantee that the cancel is genuine)
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
"I cannot speak for Opa, but my interpretation of his post:
1. Of all the examples Opa submitted for expertization, only 3 came back as fakes (in other words, skilled enough to filter out the likely fakes so as to only submit ones with near 100% certainty of being genuine)"
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Yes, that would make sense but doesn't really quite read that way. I to assume they are all fake even though that might be a bit harsh. Many of the used examples do not cat for much more than mint examples which would give the forger little incentive. It has always been a difficult area to deal with which require a lot of money buying certs to be content with what you have. Much easier just to collect these mint but is one of the areas that make it hard for used only collectors.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Scanned below are used blocks from my WW block collection. After reading through this discussion, I guess these are probably fakes, too.
Linus
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Linus, without checking the cancel dates/types, I would have put them in the possible genuine pile considering the ink appearance. That's the main reason for my post. On the genuine general postal cancels that I've seen, the ink color/spread typically has the appearance shown in your examples.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
I am no expert at all on determining whether these are fake or real cancels. I just put them in my collection, and enjoy looking at them. I just discovered that block of 10 with serrate roulette 13-and-one-half perfs this past weekend in a shoe box of worldwide I bought from the Stamp Out Cancer Auction years ago. I finally got down to the bottom of the shoe box and this block was off paper with a bunch of mint German stamps stuck to it. Using my spray bottle of water and a lot of patience, I managed to get it freed. It would be nice if it was real, as the 2016 Scott catalog value for Germany 305 used is $7.50 per stamp, or $75.00 for the whole block of 10!
Linus
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
I just spent about 1 1/2 hours writing a response. Then I hit a side button on my new mouse and everything was gone. So here we go again.
" 1. Of all the examples Opa submitted for expertization, only 3 came back as fakes (in other words, skilled enough to filter out the likely fakes so as to only submit ones with near 100% certainty of being genuine)
2. Cancels without the letter are from fake cancelers, but having the letter in the cancel does not mean it is genuine.
"
"
1. Genuine postal cancels used an oily ink (referring only to general post office cancels, not special cancels which I have seen to clearly use non-oily ink). This often results in the following...
2. ...genuine cancels often "bleed" through slightly or significantly to the back-side
3. ...genuine cancels often "spread out" giving the appearance of blurriness or unsharp lines/curves, sometimes even resulting in "blotching"
4. ...a lot of the genuine cancels that I've seen tend NOT to be dark black, and I was wondering if this is caused in part by the "bleeding" out/thru
"
"
I've always been under the impression that 90% or more of the cancellations on these stamps were fake. I find you statement that you specialize in them but have only found 3 forged cancellations, hard to understand. To those that have not heard them, there are stories of people going to the post office with wheel barrows full of cash to buy a stamps to use on mail. This extreme inflation caused used examples to be very scarce and subsequently driving their value up. It is not hard to understand how this invited the forger to fake cancels to deceive collectors.
Your statement that an N or S should follow the date to be a qualifier of legitimacy is helpful but you would think most forgers would know this and include it on their own device. I checked one of my pages (below) and all of the readable cancels did in deed have an "N" after the date. Although this does not mean they are legitimate
"
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
"Scanned below are used blocks from my WW block collection. After reading through this discussion, I guess these are probably fakes, too.
Linus
"
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Opa - Thank you for your opinion. I feel a little better that these may be real cancels. I also have this cover below from the year 1925 that was sent from Frankfort to the same Paul L. Hess in Kansas City, Missouri, USA. It helps to support the probability that the previous Frankfort cover was real.
Linus
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
BPP rates ...
https://www.bpp.de/en/sonderpruefordnung-infla.html
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Looking through my other blocks from Germany, I found this one scanned below dated 11-11-18. This one is listed in the Scott catalog under France, Occupation stamps, cat. number N21, used $2.75 each stamp if real, $22.00 for the whole block. From what I have learned from everyone contributing to this post, I think this cancel is probably fake. It looks too neat and perfect, ink is thin and uniform, not blotchy and uneven, and the cancels are carefully placed at the corners of each stamp. What is your opinion?
Thanks to all who have replied on this topic,
Linus
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Linus, I defer to the others with more experience/knowledge, but I'd be shocked if that block of 8 was genuine postally used.
If you've ever seen whole sheets of these, you'd see your block is typical example of something torn from a full sheet of favor-cancels or fake back-dated cancels. The gum is soaked off to make it look used rather than CTO. I have a couple of these, although not for that issue. I think I might have a scan stored somewhere that I'll try to post later.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
That is what I thought, also. It looks like it was taken from a CTO sheet, and there is no gum on the back just as you describe. This one looks too perfect to be real.
Linus
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
OK, here is an "example" -- I know it's the wrong time period, but just to give you an idea:
I run across these in large dealer mixes, and on occasion have seen them in auction lots as well. If I remember correctly, I have several of these panes, all with the exact same cancel. Hope the person who manufactured these didn't get carpal tunnel...
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
@ Linus
Can´t tell you if the cancel is real or not but it says "POSTUBERWACHUNGSSTELLE" which means Postal monitoring or Postal censorship.
This site might give you an idea about the cancel. Look at the 5th postcard from the top.
http://www.heimatsammlung.de/ganzsachen/deutsche-besetzungsausgaben/deutsche-besetzungsausgaben.htm
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Thanks for the link and the translation, Opa. It is the same cancel with 33, only on a postcard. Interesting.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
Hi Everyone;
Thanks Opa for that little bit of info!
I now have two sets of rubber stamps. One set has had an 'N' added and the other set has the 'V' added.
When you place your rubber stamp order, please specify either N or V, so I can ship the correct version.
I also have the Mighty Mack bridge for sale this week. It's the one that connects the upper and lower halves of Michigan.
Just sortin'....
TuskenRaider
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
A scan of killer bar cancel that I mentioned earlier.
This thing is not going into my main collection.
re: Cancelled inflation stamps
"Thanks for the link and the translation, Opa. It is the same cancel with 33, only on a postcard. Interesting."