This subject has already been raised in this thread: Scott Standard catalogs: Long-awaited reorganization of volumes ?
Really ?
Scott has decided to split each volume into an "A" and a "B" volume as an answer to collector's comments about how expensive and unwieldy the set has become.
Whoopie do, talk about kicking the can down the road !
In three or four years they will have twelve volumes each almost as heavy and bulky as this year's volumes. I suspect it was the decision of some executives who hope that this half-assed solution will bump up sales for a couple-three years, long enough to swell their retirement bonuses and, "Let someone else solve the problem, after I've gone."
What do you folks think about their decision ? Is it more likely to entice you to pony up $700.00 ?
re: Scott Re-organizes Catalog
This subject has already been raised in this thread: Scott Standard catalogs: Long-awaited reorganization of volumes ?