A mailing piece that is even 1/16th inch thick can get jammed in the first class letter sorting equipment. Since this equipment runs at near supersonic speeds any jammed results in hours of down time, and many mail pieces being damaged.
As for your speculation, I have been victim of dealers under paying postage, even, for example, after I paid for shipping and handling that was far in excess of the actual postage costs, and the extra charged for handling was sufficient for the dealer (nationally known) to personally deliver the package. That last part was a slight exaggeration, of course. However, I also had to pay a buyer's premium for the auction lots. I don't buy anything anymore where I have to pay a buyer's premium.
Thank you Michael, I see how that extra thickness might be juuuust a bit of problem. I still have this picture in my head of people sorting mail, not machines.
"What a shame Postage Due stamps went out of vogue in 1985."
"... I would have preferred a Postage Due stamp rather than a generic red "stamp" with a fill-in line. What a shame Postage Due stamps went out of vogue in 1985 ..."
"You are confusing your stamps with your stamps."
"... And good to see you survived all the dogs to make it into retirement ..."
" ...I asked why there were no postage due stamps. They shrugged and didn't have an answer. ..."
Postage due stamps, shucks, just getting them to stock decent First Class Forever stamps is a challenge.
I can't recall the last time I received anything with "Postage Due" emblazoned on it, so this was a red letter day for me. The phenomenon immediately engendered several lines of thought. First, why was this pleasant young woman standing at my door wearing a USPS white pith helmet, and attired in civilian clothes? I had to ask, "Are you with the Post Office, I thought you had to wear a uniform?" Her response, "Oh, I've been with the Post Office less than one month, we don't get a uniform allowance until then, but someone was nice enough to let me use the helmet." Wow, in the military you get a uniform on the first day.
Another observation, I would have preferred a Postage Due stamp rather than a generic red "stamp" with a fill-in line. What a shame Postage Due stamps went out of vogue in 1985.
Also, the weight of the letter was clearly under one ounce, so what was the problem? The seller had protected the stamp I ordered with two thick pieces of cardboard, which made the envelope somewhat bulgy. In fact, upon measuring, the letter was 1/16th over the limit. The Post Office does not mess around with deviations from the norm, but 1/16th inch -- really?
Or could this be some clever ploy of the seller to keep overhead down by using insufficient postage, and relying on the buyer to make up the difference. A Machiavellian maneuver indeed.
Eric
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
A mailing piece that is even 1/16th inch thick can get jammed in the first class letter sorting equipment. Since this equipment runs at near supersonic speeds any jammed results in hours of down time, and many mail pieces being damaged.
As for your speculation, I have been victim of dealers under paying postage, even, for example, after I paid for shipping and handling that was far in excess of the actual postage costs, and the extra charged for handling was sufficient for the dealer (nationally known) to personally deliver the package. That last part was a slight exaggeration, of course. However, I also had to pay a buyer's premium for the auction lots. I don't buy anything anymore where I have to pay a buyer's premium.
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
Thank you Michael, I see how that extra thickness might be juuuust a bit of problem. I still have this picture in my head of people sorting mail, not machines.
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
"What a shame Postage Due stamps went out of vogue in 1985."
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
"... I would have preferred a Postage Due stamp rather than a generic red "stamp" with a fill-in line. What a shame Postage Due stamps went out of vogue in 1985 ..."
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
"You are confusing your stamps with your stamps."
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
"... And good to see you survived all the dogs to make it into retirement ..."
re: U.S. Postage Due and a Lady in a Pith Helmet.
" ...I asked why there were no postage due stamps. They shrugged and didn't have an answer. ..."
Postage due stamps, shucks, just getting them to stock decent First Class Forever stamps is a challenge.