Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Moderator Note: Message title was modified to include country name.
(Modified by Moderator on 2016-03-21 11:37:33)
Login to Like
this post
Are you sure that is 1995 and not 1996? The 6 in the 1996 looks a lot like a 5 unless you look at it with a 30X loupe. So, I'm pretty sure that's a Scott #2921 dated 1996.
Login to Like
this post
Here is a comparison chart;
Sorry its not a little clearer, but it appears there isn't one with those serpentine die cuts and a small red 1995 date.
This might be a job for the new microscope mentioned elsewhere on this site!!
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
I saved the picture to my desktop and enlarged it. Looks like a 6 to me.
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
I downloaded it and then enlarged it too and it looks like a 1995 to me, flat top and gap in right place for a 5
Login to Like
this post
I blew up the scan and drew the opposite conclusion especially after I looked at some other copies that I have. If the ink on the 9's are blurry, it can disguise the left side of the circular part of the 6. I'm still betting this is a 6 and not a 5.
Well I looked at it again and blew it up as far as I could, and now I'm not so sure! Dang! But without a better scan or the actual stamp in our hands it is all guess work.
Isn't this a hoot? Everyone sees a slightly different thing! Love it when folks post these mystery pics. We all get to flex our philatelic sleuth muscles. fun fun fun!!!
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
That DOES look like a 5! Hmmm interesting!
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
To me...this stamp and the mystery stamp do not look similar. I mean to say the 6 is clear as can be on this. Again I am not the collector just the one who makes the scans. Thanks for forcing me to do a better job. I believe I may be learning something.
Login to Like
this post
Chris makes some good points with some excellent imagery to back it up.
Another good point not to be overlooked;
notice the "tail" on the suspect image versus the tail of the 5 on the 1995 image Chris provided - the 'tail' ending should stop abruptly before curving upward. It does NOT stop abruptly on the suspect stamp. the tails are completely different, strongly suggesting this is because its actually a 6 that wasn't completely inked properly/completely.
And again, they never printed this booklet stamp with both serpentine die cuts AND a red 1996 date.
I believe this mystery is solved - thanks Chris! 
Login to Like
this post
Well, If it were me I would send it off to be expertised. New varieties are always coming up.. Good Luck.........
Login to Like
this post
At the cost of expertising, you might want to be reasonably sure first, that what you have warrants the cost.
Just my opinion, for what its worth
Login to Like
this post
yeah, that makes sense, $20 or $30 dollar opinion over a $2.00 maximum value stamp!!!!!!
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
If cost concerns dictated the passion for discovery, I would think we would still be in the stone age.. I'm in for $10, let me know where to send it. Plus if this is a real 1995, others should show up. And I don't think it would be a $2 stamp. If it is, answers are worth small extravagance.. I've bet on many a slow horse and a few bad sports teams.. Just my two cents or $10 in this case...
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
You might want to invest in a usb magnifier, it should be able to help you see the numbers much clearer. There is a description of the magnifier in this thread. https://stamporama.com/discboard/disc_main.php?action=20&id=13811#104167
Vince
Login to Like
this post
If I look at it with my specs on it looks like a 5 - with them off it looks like a shaky 6. I don't know if that proves anything other than my eyesight is pretty ropey !!
Malcolm
Login to Like
this post
I'm feeling the whiplash, folks ... 5,6,5,6,5,6,5,6 ... but I think that Chris nailed it with the underinking argument.
Login to Like
this post
"Got my new microscope today"
That's a pretty sharp picture, Chris. Is that with an economy model scope?
Ted
Login to Like
this post
excellent, Chris....
expertising money saved!
Login to Like
this post
Now to go to the NCAA....
Login to Like
this post
Approvals
Hi! Thanks in advance for any help. This stamp is identical to # 2921 in every way except one: the date 1995. I can find no reference in my Scott 2013 Specialized. Booklet stamp that is die cut.
Moderator Note: Message title was modified to include country name.
(Modified by Moderator on 2016-03-21 11:37:33)
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
Are you sure that is 1995 and not 1996? The 6 in the 1996 looks a lot like a 5 unless you look at it with a 30X loupe. So, I'm pretty sure that's a Scott #2921 dated 1996.
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
Here is a comparison chart;
Sorry its not a little clearer, but it appears there isn't one with those serpentine die cuts and a small red 1995 date.
This might be a job for the new microscope mentioned elsewhere on this site!!
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
I saved the picture to my desktop and enlarged it. Looks like a 6 to me.
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
01:37:04pm
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
I downloaded it and then enlarged it too and it looks like a 1995 to me, flat top and gap in right place for a 5
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
I blew up the scan and drew the opposite conclusion especially after I looked at some other copies that I have. If the ink on the 9's are blurry, it can disguise the left side of the circular part of the 6. I'm still betting this is a 6 and not a 5.
Well I looked at it again and blew it up as far as I could, and now I'm not so sure! Dang! But without a better scan or the actual stamp in our hands it is all guess work.
Isn't this a hoot? Everyone sees a slightly different thing! Love it when folks post these mystery pics. We all get to flex our philatelic sleuth muscles. fun fun fun!!!
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
That DOES look like a 5! Hmmm interesting!
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Approvals
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
To me...this stamp and the mystery stamp do not look similar. I mean to say the 6 is clear as can be on this. Again I am not the collector just the one who makes the scans. Thanks for forcing me to do a better job. I believe I may be learning something.
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
Chris makes some good points with some excellent imagery to back it up.
Another good point not to be overlooked;
notice the "tail" on the suspect image versus the tail of the 5 on the 1995 image Chris provided - the 'tail' ending should stop abruptly before curving upward. It does NOT stop abruptly on the suspect stamp. the tails are completely different, strongly suggesting this is because its actually a 6 that wasn't completely inked properly/completely.
And again, they never printed this booklet stamp with both serpentine die cuts AND a red 1996 date.
I believe this mystery is solved - thanks Chris!
Login to Like
this post
08:48:36pm
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
Well, If it were me I would send it off to be expertised. New varieties are always coming up.. Good Luck.........
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
At the cost of expertising, you might want to be reasonably sure first, that what you have warrants the cost.
Just my opinion, for what its worth
Login to Like
this post
01:23:57am
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
yeah, that makes sense, $20 or $30 dollar opinion over a $2.00 maximum value stamp!!!!!!
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
02:21:58pm
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
If cost concerns dictated the passion for discovery, I would think we would still be in the stone age.. I'm in for $10, let me know where to send it. Plus if this is a real 1995, others should show up. And I don't think it would be a $2 stamp. If it is, answers are worth small extravagance.. I've bet on many a slow horse and a few bad sports teams.. Just my two cents or $10 in this case...
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
You might want to invest in a usb magnifier, it should be able to help you see the numbers much clearer. There is a description of the magnifier in this thread. https://stamporama.com/discboard/disc_main.php?action=20&id=13811#104167
Vince
Login to Like
this post
02:38:00pm
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
If I look at it with my specs on it looks like a 5 - with them off it looks like a shaky 6. I don't know if that proves anything other than my eyesight is pretty ropey !!
Malcolm
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
I'm feeling the whiplash, folks ... 5,6,5,6,5,6,5,6 ... but I think that Chris nailed it with the underinking argument.
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
"Got my new microscope today"
That's a pretty sharp picture, Chris. Is that with an economy model scope?
Ted
Login to Like
this post
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
excellent, Chris....
expertising money saved!
Login to Like
this post
07:10:22pm
re: Flag Over Porch mystery stamp (United States)
Now to go to the NCAA....
Login to Like
this post